summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/vmscan.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr>2013-02-22 16:34:06 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2013-02-23 17:50:15 -0800
commit258401a60c4df39332f30ef57afbc6dbf29a7e84 (patch)
treea397beebf23182f77ca6e688681d79eb3181308a /mm/vmscan.c
parent4db0e950c5b78586bea9e1b027be849631f89a17 (diff)
downloadlinux-258401a60c4df39332f30ef57afbc6dbf29a7e84.tar.bz2
mm: don't wait on congested zones in balance_pgdat()
From: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr> Commit 92df3a723f84 ("mm: vmscan: throttle reclaim if encountering too many dirty pages under writeback") introduced waiting on congested zones based on a sane algorithm in shrink_inactive_list(). What this means is that there's no more need for throttling and additional heuristics in balance_pgdat(). So, let's remove it and tidy up the code. Signed-off-by: Zlatko Calusic <zlatko.calusic@iskon.hr> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/vmscan.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/vmscan.c29
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 8fde2fc223d9..b93968b71dc6 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2617,7 +2617,6 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
int *classzone_idx)
{
bool pgdat_is_balanced = false;
- struct zone *unbalanced_zone;
int i;
int end_zone = 0; /* Inclusive. 0 = ZONE_DMA */
unsigned long total_scanned;
@@ -2648,9 +2647,6 @@ loop_again:
do {
unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
- int has_under_min_watermark_zone = 0;
-
- unbalanced_zone = NULL;
/*
* Scan in the highmem->dma direction for the highest
@@ -2790,17 +2786,7 @@ loop_again:
continue;
}
- if (!zone_balanced(zone, testorder, 0, end_zone)) {
- unbalanced_zone = zone;
- /*
- * We are still under min water mark. This
- * means that we have a GFP_ATOMIC allocation
- * failure risk. Hurry up!
- */
- if (!zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, order,
- min_wmark_pages(zone), end_zone, 0))
- has_under_min_watermark_zone = 1;
- } else {
+ if (zone_balanced(zone, testorder, 0, end_zone))
/*
* If a zone reaches its high watermark,
* consider it to be no longer congested. It's
@@ -2809,8 +2795,6 @@ loop_again:
* speculatively avoid congestion waits
*/
zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
- }
-
}
/*
@@ -2828,17 +2812,6 @@ loop_again:
}
/*
- * OK, kswapd is getting into trouble. Take a nap, then take
- * another pass across the zones.
- */
- if (total_scanned && (sc.priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)) {
- if (has_under_min_watermark_zone)
- count_vm_event(KSWAPD_SKIP_CONGESTION_WAIT);
- else if (unbalanced_zone)
- wait_iff_congested(unbalanced_zone, BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
- }
-
- /*
* We do this so kswapd doesn't build up large priorities for
* example when it is freeing in parallel with allocators. It
* matches the direct reclaim path behaviour in terms of impact