diff options
author | Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> | 2014-09-25 09:41:02 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2014-09-24 22:16:06 -0400 |
commit | 2ad654bc5e2b211e92f66da1d819e47d79a866f0 (patch) | |
tree | c638346ac104f054fc61649a8739b004d06aff59 /mm/slab.c | |
parent | e0e5070b20e01f0321f97db4e4e174f3f6b49e50 (diff) | |
download | linux-2ad654bc5e2b211e92f66da1d819e47d79a866f0.tar.bz2 |
cpuset: PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB should be atomic flags
When we change cpuset.memory_spread_{page,slab}, cpuset will flip
PF_SPREAD_{PAGE,SLAB} bit of tsk->flags for each task in that cpuset.
This should be done using atomic bitops, but currently we don't,
which is broken.
Tetsuo reported a hard-to-reproduce kernel crash on RHEL6, which happened
when one thread tried to clear PF_USED_MATH while at the same time another
thread tried to flip PF_SPREAD_PAGE/PF_SPREAD_SLAB. They both operate on
the same task.
Here's the full report:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/19/230
To fix this, we make PF_SPREAD_PAGE and PF_SPREAD_SLAB atomic flags.
v4:
- updated mm/slab.c. (Fengguang Wu)
- updated Documentation.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Fixes: 950592f7b991 ("cpusets: update tasks' page/slab spread flags in time")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 2.6.31+
Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/slab.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/slab.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c index a467b308c682..881951e67f12 100644 --- a/mm/slab.c +++ b/mm/slab.c @@ -2994,7 +2994,7 @@ out: #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA /* - * Try allocating on another node if PF_SPREAD_SLAB is a mempolicy is set. + * Try allocating on another node if PFA_SPREAD_SLAB is a mempolicy is set. * * If we are in_interrupt, then process context, including cpusets and * mempolicy, may not apply and should not be used for allocation policy. @@ -3226,7 +3226,7 @@ __do_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *cache, gfp_t flags) { void *objp; - if (current->mempolicy || unlikely(current->flags & PF_SPREAD_SLAB)) { + if (current->mempolicy || cpuset_do_slab_mem_spread()) { objp = alternate_node_alloc(cache, flags); if (objp) goto out; |