diff options
| author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-12-20 16:48:59 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-12-20 16:48:59 -0800 |
| commit | 60815cf2e05057db5b78e398d9734c493560b11e (patch) | |
| tree | 23d7f55df13cc5a0c072cc8a6f361f8e7050b825 /mm/rmap.c | |
| parent | bfc7249cc293deac8f2678b7ec3d2407b68c0a33 (diff) | |
| parent | 5de72a2247ac05bde7c89039631b3d0c6186fafb (diff) | |
| download | linux-60815cf2e05057db5b78e398d9734c493560b11e.tar.bz2 | |
Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux
Pull ACCESS_ONCE cleanup preparation from Christian Borntraeger:
"kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE
As discussed on LKML http://marc.info/?i=54611D86.4040306%40de.ibm.com
ACCESS_ONCE might fail with specific compilers for non-scalar
accesses.
Here is a set of patches to tackle that problem.
The first patch introduce READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE. If the data
structure is larger than the machine word size memcpy is used and a
warning is emitted. The next patches fix up several in-tree users of
ACCESS_ONCE on non-scalar types.
This does not yet contain a patch that forces ACCESS_ONCE to work only
on scalar types. This is targetted for the next merge window as Linux
next already contains new offenders regarding ACCESS_ONCE vs.
non-scalar types"
* tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/borntraeger/linux:
s390/kvm: REPLACE barrier fixup with READ_ONCE
arm/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
arm64/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE READ_ONCE
mips/gup: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
x86/gup: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
x86/spinlock: Replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE
mm: replace ACCESS_ONCE with READ_ONCE or barriers
kernel: Provide READ_ONCE and ASSIGN_ONCE
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/rmap.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/rmap.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c index 45ba250babd8..c5bc241127b2 100644 --- a/mm/rmap.c +++ b/mm/rmap.c @@ -583,7 +583,8 @@ pmd_t *mm_find_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address) * without holding anon_vma lock for write. So when looking for a * genuine pmde (in which to find pte), test present and !THP together. */ - pmde = ACCESS_ONCE(*pmd); + pmde = *pmd; + barrier(); if (!pmd_present(pmde) || pmd_trans_huge(pmde)) pmd = NULL; out: |