diff options
| author | Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> | 2019-02-01 14:20:31 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-02-01 15:46:23 -0800 |
| commit | 9bcdeb51bd7d2ae9fe65ea4d60643d2aeef5bfe3 (patch) | |
| tree | b6dd800d2211e06595a4a5eec4cdecf8257333e8 /mm/oom_kill.c | |
| parent | 80409c65e2c6cd1540045ee01fc55e50d95e0983 (diff) | |
| download | linux-9bcdeb51bd7d2ae9fe65ea4d60643d2aeef5bfe3.tar.bz2 | |
oom, oom_reaper: do not enqueue same task twice
Arkadiusz reported that enabling memcg's group oom killing causes
strange memcg statistics where there is no task in a memcg despite the
number of tasks in that memcg is not 0. It turned out that there is a
bug in wake_oom_reaper() which allows enqueuing same task twice which
makes impossible to decrease the number of tasks in that memcg due to a
refcount leak.
This bug existed since the OOM reaper became invokable from
task_will_free_mem(current) path in out_of_memory() in Linux 4.7,
T1@P1 |T2@P1 |T3@P1 |OOM reaper
----------+----------+----------+------------
# Processing an OOM victim in a different memcg domain.
try_charge()
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
mutex_lock(&oom_lock)
try_charge()
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
mutex_lock(&oom_lock)
try_charge()
mem_cgroup_out_of_memory()
mutex_lock(&oom_lock)
out_of_memory()
oom_kill_process(P1)
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, @P1)
mark_oom_victim(T1@P1)
wake_oom_reaper(T1@P1) # T1@P1 is enqueued.
mutex_unlock(&oom_lock)
out_of_memory()
mark_oom_victim(T2@P1)
wake_oom_reaper(T2@P1) # T2@P1 is enqueued.
mutex_unlock(&oom_lock)
out_of_memory()
mark_oom_victim(T1@P1)
wake_oom_reaper(T1@P1) # T1@P1 is enqueued again due to oom_reaper_list == T2@P1 && T1@P1->oom_reaper_list == NULL.
mutex_unlock(&oom_lock)
# Completed processing an OOM victim in a different memcg domain.
spin_lock(&oom_reaper_lock)
# T1P1 is dequeued.
spin_unlock(&oom_reaper_lock)
but memcg's group oom killing made it easier to trigger this bug by
calling wake_oom_reaper() on the same task from one out_of_memory()
request.
Fix this bug using an approach used by commit 855b018325737f76 ("oom,
oom_reaper: disable oom_reaper for oom_kill_allocating_task"). As a
side effect of this patch, this patch also avoids enqueuing multiple
threads sharing memory via task_will_free_mem(current) path.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e865a044-2c10-9858-f4ef-254bc71d6cc2@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5ee34fc6-1485-34f8-8790-903ddabaa809@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
Fixes: af8e15cc85a25315 ("oom, oom_reaper: do not enqueue task if it is on the oom_reaper_list head")
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Reported-by: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>
Tested-by: Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm@maven.pl>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.de>
Cc: Jay Kamat <jgkamat@fb.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/oom_kill.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/oom_kill.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index f0e8cd9edb1a..059e617a1847 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -647,8 +647,8 @@ static int oom_reaper(void *unused) static void wake_oom_reaper(struct task_struct *tsk) { - /* tsk is already queued? */ - if (tsk == oom_reaper_list || tsk->oom_reaper_list) + /* mm is already queued? */ + if (test_and_set_bit(MMF_OOM_REAP_QUEUED, &tsk->signal->oom_mm->flags)) return; get_task_struct(tsk); |