summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/mmap.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>2017-07-10 15:49:51 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2017-07-10 16:32:33 -0700
commit561b5e0709e4a248c67d024d4d94b6e31e3edf2f (patch)
tree8a5424e03ba4704bb57309eeaeb85fe10a10a598 /mm/mmap.c
parentbb01b64cfab7c22f3848cb73dc0c2b46b8d38499 (diff)
downloadlinux-561b5e0709e4a248c67d024d4d94b6e31e3edf2f.tar.bz2
mm/mmap.c: do not blow on PROT_NONE MAP_FIXED holes in the stack
Commit 1be7107fbe18 ("mm: larger stack guard gap, between vmas") has introduced a regression in some rust and Java environments which are trying to implement their own stack guard page. They are punching a new MAP_FIXED mapping inside the existing stack Vma. This will confuse expand_{downwards,upwards} into thinking that the stack expansion would in fact get us too close to an existing non-stack vma which is a correct behavior wrt safety. It is a real regression on the other hand. Let's work around the problem by considering PROT_NONE mapping as a part of the stack. This is a gros hack but overflowing to such a mapping would trap anyway an we only can hope that usespace knows what it is doing and handle it propely. Fixes: 1be7107fbe18 ("mm: larger stack guard gap, between vmas") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170705182849.GA18027@dhcp22.suse.cz Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Debugged-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/mmap.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/mmap.c6
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 7f8cfe9d9b4d..d1902872414f 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2244,7 +2244,8 @@ int expand_upwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
gap_addr = TASK_SIZE;
next = vma->vm_next;
- if (next && next->vm_start < gap_addr) {
+ if (next && next->vm_start < gap_addr &&
+ (next->vm_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_READ|VM_EXEC))) {
if (!(next->vm_flags & VM_GROWSUP))
return -ENOMEM;
/* Check that both stack segments have the same anon_vma? */
@@ -2328,7 +2329,8 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
if (gap_addr > address)
return -ENOMEM;
prev = vma->vm_prev;
- if (prev && prev->vm_end > gap_addr) {
+ if (prev && prev->vm_end > gap_addr &&
+ (prev->vm_flags & (VM_WRITE|VM_READ|VM_EXEC))) {
if (!(prev->vm_flags & VM_GROWSDOWN))
return -ENOMEM;
/* Check that both stack segments have the same anon_vma? */