diff options
| author | Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> | 2012-10-05 21:36:27 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> | 2012-12-11 14:42:37 +0000 |
| commit | 0b9d705297b273657923518dbea2377cd03532ed (patch) | |
| tree | 9049d172d6fcd71790a4689c7fed62a912516265 /mm/memory.c | |
| parent | be3a728427a605990a7a0b6dbf9e29b68e266146 (diff) | |
| download | linux-0b9d705297b273657923518dbea2377cd03532ed.tar.bz2 | |
mm: numa: Support NUMA hinting page faults from gup/gup_fast
Introduce FOLL_NUMA to tell follow_page to check
pte/pmd_numa. get_user_pages must use FOLL_NUMA, and it's safe to do
so because it always invokes handle_mm_fault and retries the
follow_page later.
KVM secondary MMU page faults will trigger the NUMA hinting page
faults through gup_fast -> get_user_pages -> follow_page ->
handle_mm_fault.
Other follow_page callers like KSM should not use FOLL_NUMA, or they
would fail to get the pages if they use follow_page instead of
get_user_pages.
[ This patch was picked up from the AutoNUMA tree. ]
Originally-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
[ ported to this tree. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memory.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memory.c | 17 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c index 7cf762857baa..cd8e0daf1912 100644 --- a/mm/memory.c +++ b/mm/memory.c @@ -1517,6 +1517,8 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address, page = follow_huge_pmd(mm, address, pmd, flags & FOLL_WRITE); goto out; } + if ((flags & FOLL_NUMA) && pmd_numa(*pmd)) + goto no_page_table; if (pmd_trans_huge(*pmd)) { if (flags & FOLL_SPLIT) { split_huge_page_pmd(mm, pmd); @@ -1546,6 +1548,8 @@ split_fallthrough: pte = *ptep; if (!pte_present(pte)) goto no_page; + if ((flags & FOLL_NUMA) && pte_numa(pte)) + goto no_page; if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !pte_write(pte)) goto unlock; @@ -1697,6 +1701,19 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm, (VM_WRITE | VM_MAYWRITE) : (VM_READ | VM_MAYREAD); vm_flags &= (gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE) ? (VM_MAYREAD | VM_MAYWRITE) : (VM_READ | VM_WRITE); + + /* + * If FOLL_FORCE and FOLL_NUMA are both set, handle_mm_fault + * would be called on PROT_NONE ranges. We must never invoke + * handle_mm_fault on PROT_NONE ranges or the NUMA hinting + * page faults would unprotect the PROT_NONE ranges if + * _PAGE_NUMA and _PAGE_PROTNONE are sharing the same pte/pmd + * bitflag. So to avoid that, don't set FOLL_NUMA if + * FOLL_FORCE is set. + */ + if (!(gup_flags & FOLL_FORCE)) + gup_flags |= FOLL_NUMA; + i = 0; do { |