summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/memcontrol.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>2010-12-29 14:07:11 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2010-12-30 10:07:06 -0800
commitebb76ce16daf6908dc030dec1c00827d37129fe5 (patch)
tree28abdc67466bb5d8d4566e36c914518b0533b4bf /mm/memcontrol.c
parentb83be6f20a0e468f715b14225c9f897538dfe5ad (diff)
downloadlinux-ebb76ce16daf6908dc030dec1c00827d37129fe5.tar.bz2
memcg: fix wrong VM_BUG_ON() in try_charge()'s mm->owner check
At __mem_cgroup_try_charge(), VM_BUG_ON(!mm->owner) is checked. But as commented in mem_cgroup_from_task(), mm->owner can be NULL in some racy case. This check of VM_BUG_ON() is bad. A possible story to hit this is at swapoff()->try_to_unuse(). It passes mm_struct to mem_cgroup_try_charge_swapin() while mm->owner is NULL. If we can't get proper mem_cgroup from swap_cgroup information, mm->owner is used as charge target and we see NULL. Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Reported-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/memcontrol.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/memcontrol.c19
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 7a22b4129211..00bb8a64d028 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1925,19 +1925,18 @@ again:
rcu_read_lock();
p = rcu_dereference(mm->owner);
- VM_BUG_ON(!p);
/*
- * because we don't have task_lock(), "p" can exit while
- * we're here. In that case, "mem" can point to root
- * cgroup but never be NULL. (and task_struct itself is freed
- * by RCU, cgroup itself is RCU safe.) Then, we have small
- * risk here to get wrong cgroup. But such kind of mis-account
- * by race always happens because we don't have cgroup_mutex().
- * It's overkill and we allow that small race, here.
+ * Because we don't have task_lock(), "p" can exit.
+ * In that case, "mem" can point to root or p can be NULL with
+ * race with swapoff. Then, we have small risk of mis-accouning.
+ * But such kind of mis-account by race always happens because
+ * we don't have cgroup_mutex(). It's overkill and we allo that
+ * small race, here.
+ * (*) swapoff at el will charge against mm-struct not against
+ * task-struct. So, mm->owner can be NULL.
*/
mem = mem_cgroup_from_task(p);
- VM_BUG_ON(!mem);
- if (mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
+ if (!mem || mem_cgroup_is_root(mem)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
goto done;
}