diff options
author | Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> | 2019-05-13 17:17:03 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2019-05-14 09:47:45 -0700 |
commit | 932f4a630a695212bdc7379b05f9bd0dafc5d968 (patch) | |
tree | 928198851c011a5a4d82f34f61cd85f364d9df8d /mm/gup.c | |
parent | a222f341586834073c2bbea225be38216eb5d993 (diff) | |
download | linux-932f4a630a695212bdc7379b05f9bd0dafc5d968.tar.bz2 |
mm/gup: replace get_user_pages_longterm() with FOLL_LONGTERM
Pach series "Add FOLL_LONGTERM to GUP fast and use it".
HFI1, qib, and mthca, use get_user_pages_fast() due to its performance
advantages. These pages can be held for a significant time. But
get_user_pages_fast() does not protect against mapping FS DAX pages.
Introduce FOLL_LONGTERM and use this flag in get_user_pages_fast() which
retains the performance while also adding the FS DAX checks. XDP has also
shown interest in using this functionality.[1]
In addition we change get_user_pages() to use the new FOLL_LONGTERM flag
and remove the specialized get_user_pages_longterm call.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/3/19/939
"longterm" is a relative thing and at this point is probably a misnomer.
This is really flagging a pin which is going to be given to hardware and
can't move. I've thought of a couple of alternative names but I think we
have to settle on if we are going to use FL_LAYOUT or something else to
solve the "longterm" problem. Then I think we can change the flag to a
better name.
Secondly, it depends on how often you are registering memory. I have
spoken with some RDMA users who consider MR in the performance path...
For the overall application performance. I don't have the numbers as the
tests for HFI1 were done a long time ago. But there was a significant
advantage. Some of which is probably due to the fact that you don't have
to hold mmap_sem.
Finally, architecturally I think it would be good for everyone to use
*_fast. There are patches submitted to the RDMA list which would allow
the use of *_fast (they reworking the use of mmap_sem) and as soon as they
are accepted I'll submit a patch to convert the RDMA core as well. Also
to this point others are looking to use *_fast.
As an aside, Jasons pointed out in my previous submission that *_fast and
*_unlocked look very much the same. I agree and I think further cleanup
will be coming. But I'm focused on getting the final solution for DAX at
the moment.
This patch (of 7):
This patch starts a series which aims to support FOLL_LONGTERM in
get_user_pages_fast(). Some callers who would like to do a longterm (user
controlled pin) of pages with the fast variant of GUP for performance
purposes.
Rather than have a separate get_user_pages_longterm() call, introduce
FOLL_LONGTERM and change the longterm callers to use it.
This patch does not change any functionality. In the short term
"longterm" or user controlled pins are unsafe for Filesystems and FS DAX
in particular has been blocked. However, callers of get_user_pages_fast()
were not "protected".
FOLL_LONGTERM can _only_ be supported with get_user_pages[_fast]() as it
requires vmas to determine if DAX is in use.
NOTE: In merging with the CMA changes we opt to change the
get_user_pages() call in check_and_migrate_cma_pages() to a call of
__get_user_pages_locked() on the newly migrated pages. This makes the
code read better in that we are calling __get_user_pages_locked() on the
pages before and after a potential migration.
As a side affect some of the interfaces are cleaned up but this is not the
primary purpose of the series.
In review[1] it was asked:
<quote>
> This I don't get - if you do lock down long term mappings performance
> of the actual get_user_pages call shouldn't matter to start with.
>
> What do I miss?
A couple of points.
First "longterm" is a relative thing and at this point is probably a
misnomer. This is really flagging a pin which is going to be given to
hardware and can't move. I've thought of a couple of alternative names
but I think we have to settle on if we are going to use FL_LAYOUT or
something else to solve the "longterm" problem. Then I think we can
change the flag to a better name.
Second, It depends on how often you are registering memory. I have spoken
with some RDMA users who consider MR in the performance path... For the
overall application performance. I don't have the numbers as the tests
for HFI1 were done a long time ago. But there was a significant
advantage. Some of which is probably due to the fact that you don't have
to hold mmap_sem.
Finally, architecturally I think it would be good for everyone to use
*_fast. There are patches submitted to the RDMA list which would allow
the use of *_fast (they reworking the use of mmap_sem) and as soon as they
are accepted I'll submit a patch to convert the RDMA core as well. Also
to this point others are looking to use *_fast.
As an asside, Jasons pointed out in my previous submission that *_fast and
*_unlocked look very much the same. I agree and I think further cleanup
will be coming. But I'm focused on getting the final solution for DAX at
the moment.
</quote>
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190220180255.GA12020@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com/T/#md6abad2569f3bf6c1f03686c8097ab6563e94965
[ira.weiny@intel.com: v3]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190328084422.29911-2-ira.weiny@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190328084422.29911-2-ira.weiny@intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190317183438.2057-2-ira.weiny@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Marshall <hubcap@omnibond.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/gup.c')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/gup.c | 190 |
1 files changed, 117 insertions, 73 deletions
@@ -1018,6 +1018,15 @@ long get_user_pages_locked(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages, unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages, int *locked) { + /* + * FIXME: Current FOLL_LONGTERM behavior is incompatible with + * FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY because of the FS DAX check requirement on + * vmas. As there are no users of this flag in this call we simply + * disallow this option for now. + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM)) + return -EINVAL; + return __get_user_pages_locked(current, current->mm, start, nr_pages, pages, NULL, locked, gup_flags | FOLL_TOUCH); @@ -1046,6 +1055,15 @@ long get_user_pages_unlocked(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages, int locked = 1; long ret; + /* + * FIXME: Current FOLL_LONGTERM behavior is incompatible with + * FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY because of the FS DAX check requirement on + * vmas. As there are no users of this flag in this call we simply + * disallow this option for now. + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM)) + return -EINVAL; + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem); ret = __get_user_pages_locked(current, mm, start, nr_pages, pages, NULL, &locked, gup_flags | FOLL_TOUCH); @@ -1116,32 +1134,22 @@ long get_user_pages_remote(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages, struct vm_area_struct **vmas, int *locked) { + /* + * FIXME: Current FOLL_LONGTERM behavior is incompatible with + * FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY because of the FS DAX check requirement on + * vmas. As there are no users of this flag in this call we simply + * disallow this option for now. + */ + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM)) + return -EINVAL; + return __get_user_pages_locked(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, pages, vmas, locked, gup_flags | FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_REMOTE); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages_remote); -/* - * This is the same as get_user_pages_remote(), just with a - * less-flexible calling convention where we assume that the task - * and mm being operated on are the current task's and don't allow - * passing of a locked parameter. We also obviously don't pass - * FOLL_REMOTE in here. - */ -long get_user_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages, - unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages, - struct vm_area_struct **vmas) -{ - return __get_user_pages_locked(current, current->mm, start, nr_pages, - pages, vmas, NULL, - gup_flags | FOLL_TOUCH); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages); - #if defined(CONFIG_FS_DAX) || defined (CONFIG_CMA) - -#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX static bool check_dax_vmas(struct vm_area_struct **vmas, long nr_pages) { long i; @@ -1160,12 +1168,6 @@ static bool check_dax_vmas(struct vm_area_struct **vmas, long nr_pages) } return false; } -#else -static inline bool check_dax_vmas(struct vm_area_struct **vmas, long nr_pages) -{ - return false; -} -#endif #ifdef CONFIG_CMA static struct page *new_non_cma_page(struct page *page, unsigned long private) @@ -1219,10 +1221,13 @@ static struct page *new_non_cma_page(struct page *page, unsigned long private) return __alloc_pages_node(nid, gfp_mask, 0); } -static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(unsigned long start, long nr_pages, - unsigned int gup_flags, +static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long start, + unsigned long nr_pages, struct page **pages, - struct vm_area_struct **vmas) + struct vm_area_struct **vmas, + unsigned int gup_flags) { long i; bool drain_allow = true; @@ -1278,10 +1283,14 @@ check_again: putback_movable_pages(&cma_page_list); } /* - * We did migrate all the pages, Try to get the page references again - * migrating any new CMA pages which we failed to isolate earlier. + * We did migrate all the pages, Try to get the page references + * again migrating any new CMA pages which we failed to isolate + * earlier. */ - nr_pages = get_user_pages(start, nr_pages, gup_flags, pages, vmas); + nr_pages = __get_user_pages_locked(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, + pages, vmas, NULL, + gup_flags); + if ((nr_pages > 0) && migrate_allow) { drain_allow = true; goto check_again; @@ -1291,66 +1300,101 @@ check_again: return nr_pages; } #else -static inline long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(unsigned long start, long nr_pages, - unsigned int gup_flags, - struct page **pages, - struct vm_area_struct **vmas) +static long check_and_migrate_cma_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long start, + unsigned long nr_pages, + struct page **pages, + struct vm_area_struct **vmas, + unsigned int gup_flags) { return nr_pages; } #endif /* - * This is the same as get_user_pages() in that it assumes we are - * operating on the current task's mm, but it goes further to validate - * that the vmas associated with the address range are suitable for - * longterm elevated page reference counts. For example, filesystem-dax - * mappings are subject to the lifetime enforced by the filesystem and - * we need guarantees that longterm users like RDMA and V4L2 only - * establish mappings that have a kernel enforced revocation mechanism. - * - * "longterm" == userspace controlled elevated page count lifetime. - * Contrast this to iov_iter_get_pages() usages which are transient. + * __gup_longterm_locked() is a wrapper for __get_user_pages_locked which + * allows us to process the FOLL_LONGTERM flag. */ -long get_user_pages_longterm(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages, - unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages, - struct vm_area_struct **vmas_arg) +static long __gup_longterm_locked(struct task_struct *tsk, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long start, + unsigned long nr_pages, + struct page **pages, + struct vm_area_struct **vmas, + unsigned int gup_flags) { - struct vm_area_struct **vmas = vmas_arg; - unsigned long flags; + struct vm_area_struct **vmas_tmp = vmas; + unsigned long flags = 0; long rc, i; - if (!pages) - return -EINVAL; - - if (!vmas) { - vmas = kcalloc(nr_pages, sizeof(struct vm_area_struct *), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!vmas) - return -ENOMEM; + if (gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) { + if (!pages) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!vmas_tmp) { + vmas_tmp = kcalloc(nr_pages, + sizeof(struct vm_area_struct *), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!vmas_tmp) + return -ENOMEM; + } + flags = memalloc_nocma_save(); } - flags = memalloc_nocma_save(); - rc = get_user_pages(start, nr_pages, gup_flags, pages, vmas); - memalloc_nocma_restore(flags); - if (rc < 0) - goto out; + rc = __get_user_pages_locked(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, pages, + vmas_tmp, NULL, gup_flags); - if (check_dax_vmas(vmas, rc)) { - for (i = 0; i < rc; i++) - put_page(pages[i]); - rc = -EOPNOTSUPP; - goto out; + if (gup_flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) { + memalloc_nocma_restore(flags); + if (rc < 0) + goto out; + + if (check_dax_vmas(vmas_tmp, rc)) { + for (i = 0; i < rc; i++) + put_page(pages[i]); + rc = -EOPNOTSUPP; + goto out; + } + + rc = check_and_migrate_cma_pages(tsk, mm, start, rc, pages, + vmas_tmp, gup_flags); } - rc = check_and_migrate_cma_pages(start, rc, gup_flags, pages, vmas); out: - if (vmas != vmas_arg) - kfree(vmas); + if (vmas_tmp != vmas) + kfree(vmas_tmp); return rc; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages_longterm); -#endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */ +#else /* !CONFIG_FS_DAX && !CONFIG_CMA */ +static __always_inline long __gup_longterm_locked(struct task_struct *tsk, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long start, + unsigned long nr_pages, + struct page **pages, + struct vm_area_struct **vmas, + unsigned int flags) +{ + return __get_user_pages_locked(tsk, mm, start, nr_pages, pages, vmas, + NULL, flags); +} +#endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX || CONFIG_CMA */ + +/* + * This is the same as get_user_pages_remote(), just with a + * less-flexible calling convention where we assume that the task + * and mm being operated on are the current task's and don't allow + * passing of a locked parameter. We also obviously don't pass + * FOLL_REMOTE in here. + */ +long get_user_pages(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages, + unsigned int gup_flags, struct page **pages, + struct vm_area_struct **vmas) +{ + return __gup_longterm_locked(current, current->mm, start, nr_pages, + pages, vmas, gup_flags | FOLL_TOUCH); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_user_pages); /** * populate_vma_page_range() - populate a range of pages in the vma. |