diff options
author | Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com> | 2021-05-25 13:20:11 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> | 2021-05-27 15:38:03 +0200 |
commit | 1b932689c77766b68e2ead51ca0fb84ec5bb8965 (patch) | |
tree | 21122208e0a00f3c39c351bbf8d6b0df2fe6b853 /lib | |
parent | ef04d4ff4b19628c78abddc768acce097d35d086 (diff) | |
download | linux-1b932689c77766b68e2ead51ca0fb84ec5bb8965.tar.bz2 |
lib: test_scanf: Remove pointless use of type_min() with unsigned types
sparse was producing warnings of the form:
sparse: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffff0001 becomes 1)
There is no actual problem here. Using type_min() on an unsigned type
results in an (expected) truncation.
However, there is no need to test an unsigned value against type_min().
The minimum value of an unsigned is obviously 0, and any value cast to
an unsigned type is >= 0, so for unsigneds only type_max() need be tested.
This patch also takes the opportunity to clean up the implementation of
simple_numbers_loop() to use a common pattern for the positive and
negative test.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210525122012.6336-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/test_scanf.c | 13 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/lib/test_scanf.c b/lib/test_scanf.c index 8d577aec6c28..48ff5747a4da 100644 --- a/lib/test_scanf.c +++ b/lib/test_scanf.c @@ -187,8 +187,8 @@ static const unsigned long long numbers[] __initconst = { #define value_representable_in_type(T, val) \ (is_signed_type(T) \ ? ((long long)(val) >= type_min(T)) && ((long long)(val) <= type_max(T)) \ - : ((unsigned long long)(val) >= type_min(T)) && \ - ((unsigned long long)(val) <= type_max(T))) + : ((unsigned long long)(val) <= type_max(T))) + #define test_one_number(T, gen_fmt, scan_fmt, val, fn) \ do { \ @@ -204,12 +204,11 @@ do { \ int i; \ \ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(numbers); i++) { \ - if (!value_representable_in_type(T, numbers[i])) \ - continue; \ - \ - test_one_number(T, gen_fmt, scan_fmt, numbers[i], fn); \ + if (value_representable_in_type(T, numbers[i])) \ + test_one_number(T, gen_fmt, scan_fmt, \ + numbers[i], fn); \ \ - if (is_signed_type(T)) \ + if (value_representable_in_type(T, -numbers[i])) \ test_one_number(T, gen_fmt, scan_fmt, \ -numbers[i], fn); \ } \ |