summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/nodemask.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-02-12 19:04:25 -0600
committerJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>2020-02-20 13:33:51 -0400
commit5b361328ca649534d721e4eae20c96ccbe702ce7 (patch)
treeaecd94c8ba19a810b66a90a2914b5834ba2832a4 /lib/nodemask.c
parent52c5e9e7497b728b53a84cbd5873c4b707d10d55 (diff)
downloadlinux-5b361328ca649534d721e4eae20c96ccbe702ce7.tar.bz2
RDMA: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200213010425.GA13068@embeddedor.com Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> # added a few more
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/nodemask.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions