diff options
author | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> | 2014-06-04 16:11:43 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-06-04 16:54:17 -0700 |
commit | 6d9bcb621b0b0a20604cbdb298c4487e44dd0da2 (patch) | |
tree | e6bb8032b8662be3551d4abcc04499c39c9e85df /kernel | |
parent | c224815dac9c739b79050d3cc67443ff500bc478 (diff) | |
download | linux-6d9bcb621b0b0a20604cbdb298c4487e44dd0da2.tar.bz2 |
timekeeping: use printk_deferred when holding timekeeping seqlock
Jiri Bohac pointed out that there are rare but potential deadlock
possibilities when calling printk while holding the timekeeping
seqlock.
This is due to printk() triggering console sem wakeup, which can
cause scheduling code to trigger hrtimers which may try to read
the time.
Specifically, as Jiri pointed out, that path is:
printk
vprintk_emit
console_unlock
up(&console_sem)
__up
wake_up_process
try_to_wake_up
ttwu_do_activate
ttwu_activate
activate_task
enqueue_task
enqueue_task_fair
hrtick_update
hrtick_start_fair
hrtick_start_fair
get_time
ktime_get
--> endless loop on
read_seqcount_retry(&timekeeper_seq, ...)
This patch tries to avoid this issue by using printk_deferred (previously
named printk_sched) which should defer printing via a irq_work_queue.
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/ntp.c | 15 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 7 |
2 files changed, 13 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/ntp.c b/kernel/time/ntp.c index 419a52cecd20..5b0ac4de3822 100644 --- a/kernel/time/ntp.c +++ b/kernel/time/ntp.c @@ -786,8 +786,9 @@ static long hardpps_update_freq(struct pps_normtime freq_norm) time_status |= STA_PPSERROR; pps_errcnt++; pps_dec_freq_interval(); - pr_err("hardpps: PPSERROR: interval too long - %ld s\n", - freq_norm.sec); + printk_deferred(KERN_ERR + "hardpps: PPSERROR: interval too long - %ld s\n", + freq_norm.sec); return 0; } @@ -800,7 +801,8 @@ static long hardpps_update_freq(struct pps_normtime freq_norm) delta = shift_right(ftemp - pps_freq, NTP_SCALE_SHIFT); pps_freq = ftemp; if (delta > PPS_MAXWANDER || delta < -PPS_MAXWANDER) { - pr_warning("hardpps: PPSWANDER: change=%ld\n", delta); + printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING + "hardpps: PPSWANDER: change=%ld\n", delta); time_status |= STA_PPSWANDER; pps_stbcnt++; pps_dec_freq_interval(); @@ -844,8 +846,9 @@ static void hardpps_update_phase(long error) * the time offset is updated. */ if (jitter > (pps_jitter << PPS_POPCORN)) { - pr_warning("hardpps: PPSJITTER: jitter=%ld, limit=%ld\n", - jitter, (pps_jitter << PPS_POPCORN)); + printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING + "hardpps: PPSJITTER: jitter=%ld, limit=%ld\n", + jitter, (pps_jitter << PPS_POPCORN)); time_status |= STA_PPSJITTER; pps_jitcnt++; } else if (time_status & STA_PPSTIME) { @@ -902,7 +905,7 @@ void __hardpps(const struct timespec *phase_ts, const struct timespec *raw_ts) time_status |= STA_PPSJITTER; /* restart the frequency calibration interval */ pps_fbase = *raw_ts; - pr_err("hardpps: PPSJITTER: bad pulse\n"); + printk_deferred(KERN_ERR "hardpps: PPSJITTER: bad pulse\n"); return; } diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index f7df8ea21707..32d8d6aaedb8 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -852,8 +852,9 @@ static void __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct timekeeper *tk, struct timespec *delta) { if (!timespec_valid_strict(delta)) { - printk(KERN_WARNING "__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime: Invalid " - "sleep delta value!\n"); + printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING + "__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime: Invalid " + "sleep delta value!\n"); return; } tk_xtime_add(tk, delta); @@ -1157,7 +1158,7 @@ static void timekeeping_adjust(struct timekeeper *tk, s64 offset) if (unlikely(tk->clock->maxadj && (tk->mult + adj > tk->clock->mult + tk->clock->maxadj))) { - printk_once(KERN_WARNING + printk_deferred_once(KERN_WARNING "Adjusting %s more than 11%% (%ld vs %ld)\n", tk->clock->name, (long)tk->mult + adj, (long)tk->clock->mult + tk->clock->maxadj); |