diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2018-02-06 17:52:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2018-02-13 11:44:41 +0100 |
commit | 269d599271fa604f09d5cb0093c5dd5d59964dd5 (patch) | |
tree | e6cb32acb59211a8842d78f3590ba54165ae8491 /kernel | |
parent | a7711602c7b79950ea437178f601b52ab08ef659 (diff) | |
download | linux-269d599271fa604f09d5cb0093c5dd5d59964dd5.tar.bz2 |
sched/core: Fix DEBUG_SPINLOCK annotation for rq->lock
Mark noticed that he had sporadic "spinlock recursion" warnings from
the DEBUG_SPINLOCK code. Now rq->lock is special in that the owner
changes in the middle of a context switch.
It so happens that we fix up the lock.owner too late, @prev can run
(remotely) the moment prev->on_cpu is cleared, this then allows @prev
to again try and acquire this rq->lock and trigger this warning.
So we have to switch lock.owner before clearing prev->on_cpu.
Do this by moving the DEBUG_SPINLOCK annotation from after switch_to()
to before switch_to() and collect all lockdep annotations there into
prepare_lock_switch() to mirror the existing finish_lock_switch().
Debugged-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 27 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index bf724c1952ea..e7c535eee0a6 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -2601,19 +2601,31 @@ static inline void finish_task(struct task_struct *prev) #endif } -static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq) +static inline void +prepare_lock_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf) { + /* + * Since the runqueue lock will be released by the next + * task (which is an invalid locking op but in the case + * of the scheduler it's an obvious special-case), so we + * do an early lockdep release here: + */ + rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); + spin_release(&rq->lock.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK /* this is a valid case when another task releases the spinlock */ - rq->lock.owner = current; + rq->lock.owner = next; #endif +} + +static inline void finish_lock_switch(struct rq *rq) +{ /* * If we are tracking spinlock dependencies then we have to * fix up the runqueue lock - which gets 'carried over' from * prev into current: */ spin_acquire(&rq->lock.dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock); } @@ -2844,14 +2856,7 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, rq->clock_update_flags &= ~(RQCF_ACT_SKIP|RQCF_REQ_SKIP); - /* - * Since the runqueue lock will be released by the next - * task (which is an invalid locking op but in the case - * of the scheduler it's an obvious special-case), so we - * do an early lockdep release here: - */ - rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf); - spin_release(&rq->lock.dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); + prepare_lock_switch(rq, next, rf); /* Here we just switch the register state and the stack. */ switch_to(prev, next, prev); |