summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/trace
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>2013-11-07 14:43:42 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2014-01-13 13:41:11 +0100
commitaf6ace764d03900524e9b1ac621a1c520ee49fc6 (patch)
tree4fd7117b730a77a77be2bcd24c53284f9568ed75 /kernel/trace
parent755378a47192a3d1f7c3a8ca6c15c1cf76de0af2 (diff)
downloadlinux-af6ace764d03900524e9b1ac621a1c520ee49fc6.tar.bz2
sched/deadline: Add latency tracing for SCHED_DEADLINE tasks
It is very likely that systems that wants/needs to use the new SCHED_DEADLINE policy also want to have the scheduling latency of the -deadline tasks under control. For this reason a new version of the scheduling wakeup latency, called "wakeup_dl", is introduced. As a consequence of applying this patch there will be three wakeup latency tracer: * "wakeup", that deals with all tasks in the system; * "wakeup_rt", that deals with -rt and -deadline tasks only; * "wakeup_dl", that deals with -deadline tasks only. Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1383831828-15501-9-git-send-email-juri.lelli@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/trace')
-rw-r--r--kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c64
-rw-r--r--kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c33
2 files changed, 79 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
index fee77e15d815..090c4d9dcf16 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_sched_wakeup.c
@@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ static int wakeup_cpu;
static int wakeup_current_cpu;
static unsigned wakeup_prio = -1;
static int wakeup_rt;
+static int wakeup_dl;
+static int tracing_dl = 0;
static arch_spinlock_t wakeup_lock =
(arch_spinlock_t)__ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
@@ -437,6 +439,7 @@ static void __wakeup_reset(struct trace_array *tr)
{
wakeup_cpu = -1;
wakeup_prio = -1;
+ tracing_dl = 0;
if (wakeup_task)
put_task_struct(wakeup_task);
@@ -472,9 +475,17 @@ probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p, int success)
tracing_record_cmdline(p);
tracing_record_cmdline(current);
- if ((wakeup_rt && !rt_task(p)) ||
- p->prio >= wakeup_prio ||
- p->prio >= current->prio)
+ /*
+ * Semantic is like this:
+ * - wakeup tracer handles all tasks in the system, independently
+ * from their scheduling class;
+ * - wakeup_rt tracer handles tasks belonging to sched_dl and
+ * sched_rt class;
+ * - wakeup_dl handles tasks belonging to sched_dl class only.
+ */
+ if (tracing_dl || (wakeup_dl && !dl_task(p)) ||
+ (wakeup_rt && !dl_task(p) && !rt_task(p)) ||
+ (!dl_task(p) && (p->prio >= wakeup_prio || p->prio >= current->prio)))
return;
pc = preempt_count();
@@ -486,7 +497,8 @@ probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p, int success)
arch_spin_lock(&wakeup_lock);
/* check for races. */
- if (!tracer_enabled || p->prio >= wakeup_prio)
+ if (!tracer_enabled || tracing_dl ||
+ (!dl_task(p) && p->prio >= wakeup_prio))
goto out_locked;
/* reset the trace */
@@ -496,6 +508,15 @@ probe_wakeup(void *ignore, struct task_struct *p, int success)
wakeup_current_cpu = wakeup_cpu;
wakeup_prio = p->prio;
+ /*
+ * Once you start tracing a -deadline task, don't bother tracing
+ * another task until the first one wakes up.
+ */
+ if (dl_task(p))
+ tracing_dl = 1;
+ else
+ tracing_dl = 0;
+
wakeup_task = p;
get_task_struct(wakeup_task);
@@ -597,16 +618,25 @@ static int __wakeup_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr)
static int wakeup_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr)
{
+ wakeup_dl = 0;
wakeup_rt = 0;
return __wakeup_tracer_init(tr);
}
static int wakeup_rt_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr)
{
+ wakeup_dl = 0;
wakeup_rt = 1;
return __wakeup_tracer_init(tr);
}
+static int wakeup_dl_tracer_init(struct trace_array *tr)
+{
+ wakeup_dl = 1;
+ wakeup_rt = 0;
+ return __wakeup_tracer_init(tr);
+}
+
static void wakeup_tracer_reset(struct trace_array *tr)
{
int lat_flag = save_flags & TRACE_ITER_LATENCY_FMT;
@@ -674,6 +704,28 @@ static struct tracer wakeup_rt_tracer __read_mostly =
.use_max_tr = true,
};
+static struct tracer wakeup_dl_tracer __read_mostly =
+{
+ .name = "wakeup_dl",
+ .init = wakeup_dl_tracer_init,
+ .reset = wakeup_tracer_reset,
+ .start = wakeup_tracer_start,
+ .stop = wakeup_tracer_stop,
+ .wait_pipe = poll_wait_pipe,
+ .print_max = true,
+ .print_header = wakeup_print_header,
+ .print_line = wakeup_print_line,
+ .flags = &tracer_flags,
+ .set_flag = wakeup_set_flag,
+ .flag_changed = wakeup_flag_changed,
+#ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE_SELFTEST
+ .selftest = trace_selftest_startup_wakeup,
+#endif
+ .open = wakeup_trace_open,
+ .close = wakeup_trace_close,
+ .use_max_tr = true,
+};
+
__init static int init_wakeup_tracer(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -686,6 +738,10 @@ __init static int init_wakeup_tracer(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ ret = register_tracer(&wakeup_dl_tracer);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
return 0;
}
core_initcall(init_wakeup_tracer);
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
index a7329b7902f8..e98fca60974f 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_selftest.c
@@ -1022,11 +1022,16 @@ trace_selftest_startup_nop(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_TRACER
static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data)
{
- /* Make this a RT thread, doesn't need to be too high */
- static const struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = 5 };
+ /* Make this a -deadline thread */
+ static const struct sched_attr attr = {
+ .sched_policy = SCHED_DEADLINE,
+ .sched_runtime = 100000ULL,
+ .sched_deadline = 10000000ULL,
+ .sched_period = 10000000ULL
+ };
struct completion *x = data;
- sched_setscheduler(current, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
+ sched_setattr(current, &attr);
/* Make it know we have a new prio */
complete(x);
@@ -1040,8 +1045,8 @@ static int trace_wakeup_test_thread(void *data)
/* we are awake, now wait to disappear */
while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
/*
- * This is an RT task, do short sleeps to let
- * others run.
+ * This will likely be the system top priority
+ * task, do short sleeps to let others run.
*/
msleep(100);
}
@@ -1054,21 +1059,21 @@ trace_selftest_startup_wakeup(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
{
unsigned long save_max = tracing_max_latency;
struct task_struct *p;
- struct completion isrt;
+ struct completion is_ready;
unsigned long count;
int ret;
- init_completion(&isrt);
+ init_completion(&is_ready);
- /* create a high prio thread */
- p = kthread_run(trace_wakeup_test_thread, &isrt, "ftrace-test");
+ /* create a -deadline thread */
+ p = kthread_run(trace_wakeup_test_thread, &is_ready, "ftrace-test");
if (IS_ERR(p)) {
printk(KERN_CONT "Failed to create ftrace wakeup test thread ");
return -1;
}
- /* make sure the thread is running at an RT prio */
- wait_for_completion(&isrt);
+ /* make sure the thread is running at -deadline policy */
+ wait_for_completion(&is_ready);
/* start the tracing */
ret = tracer_init(trace, tr);
@@ -1082,19 +1087,19 @@ trace_selftest_startup_wakeup(struct tracer *trace, struct trace_array *tr)
while (p->on_rq) {
/*
- * Sleep to make sure the RT thread is asleep too.
+ * Sleep to make sure the -deadline thread is asleep too.
* On virtual machines we can't rely on timings,
* but we want to make sure this test still works.
*/
msleep(100);
}
- init_completion(&isrt);
+ init_completion(&is_ready);
wake_up_process(p);
/* Wait for the task to wake up */
- wait_for_completion(&isrt);
+ wait_for_completion(&is_ready);
/* stop the tracing. */
tracing_stop();