diff options
| author | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> | 2012-08-31 13:30:06 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2012-09-01 10:24:48 -0700 |
| commit | cee58483cf56e0ba355fdd97ff5e8925329aa936 (patch) | |
| tree | 8cc2dc979a93a48a07c25d309250a2271e508e21 /kernel/time | |
| parent | 7a611e69b26069a511d9d5251c6a28af6c521121 (diff) | |
| download | linux-cee58483cf56e0ba355fdd97ff5e8925329aa936.tar.bz2 | |
time: Move ktime_t overflow checking into timespec_valid_strict
Andreas Bombe reported that the added ktime_t overflow checking added to
timespec_valid in commit 4e8b14526ca7 ("time: Improve sanity checking of
timekeeping inputs") was causing problems with X.org because it caused
timeouts larger then KTIME_T to be invalid.
Previously, these large timeouts would be clamped to KTIME_MAX and would
never expire, which is valid.
This patch splits the ktime_t overflow checking into a new
timespec_valid_strict function, and converts the timekeeping codes
internal checking to use this more strict function.
Reported-and-tested-by: Andreas Bombe <aeb@debian.org>
Cc: Zhouping Liu <zliu@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index 0c1485e42be6..34e5eac81424 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -428,7 +428,7 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv) struct timespec ts_delta, xt; unsigned long flags; - if (!timespec_valid(tv)) + if (!timespec_valid_strict(tv)) return -EINVAL; write_seqlock_irqsave(&tk->lock, flags); @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct timespec *ts) /* Make sure the proposed value is valid */ tmp = timespec_add(tk_xtime(tk), *ts); - if (!timespec_valid(&tmp)) { + if (!timespec_valid_strict(&tmp)) { ret = -EINVAL; goto error; } @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void) struct timespec now, boot, tmp; read_persistent_clock(&now); - if (!timespec_valid(&now)) { + if (!timespec_valid_strict(&now)) { pr_warn("WARNING: Persistent clock returned invalid value!\n" " Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n"); now.tv_sec = 0; @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void) } read_boot_clock(&boot); - if (!timespec_valid(&boot)) { + if (!timespec_valid_strict(&boot)) { pr_warn("WARNING: Boot clock returned invalid value!\n" " Check your CMOS/BIOS settings.\n"); boot.tv_sec = 0; @@ -713,7 +713,7 @@ static struct timespec timekeeping_suspend_time; static void __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct timekeeper *tk, struct timespec *delta) { - if (!timespec_valid(delta)) { + if (!timespec_valid_strict(delta)) { printk(KERN_WARNING "__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime: Invalid " "sleep delta value!\n"); return; |