diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-08-13 12:23:39 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2018-08-13 12:23:39 -0700 |
commit | de5d1b39ea0b38a9f4dfb08966042b7b91e2df30 (patch) | |
tree | 3591bdac4fe6756b4e3dc68b2ed1c792c4104218 /kernel/sched | |
parent | 1c594774283a7cfe6dc0f8ffdfb2dbfc497502c4 (diff) | |
parent | fd2efaa4eb5317c3a86357a83a7d456a1b86a0ac (diff) | |
download | linux-de5d1b39ea0b38a9f4dfb08966042b7b91e2df30.tar.bz2 |
Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking/atomics update from Thomas Gleixner:
"The locking, atomics and memory model brains delivered:
- A larger update to the atomics code which reworks the ordering
barriers, consolidates the atomic primitives, provides the new
atomic64_fetch_add_unless() primitive and cleans up the include
hell.
- Simplify cmpxchg() instrumentation and add instrumentation for
xchg() and cmpxchg_double().
- Updates to the memory model and documentation"
* 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (48 commits)
locking/atomics: Rework ordering barriers
locking/atomics: Instrument cmpxchg_double*()
locking/atomics: Instrument xchg()
locking/atomics: Simplify cmpxchg() instrumentation
locking/atomics/x86: Reduce arch_cmpxchg64*() instrumentation
tools/memory-model: Rename litmus tests to comply to norm7
tools/memory-model/Documentation: Fix typo, smb->smp
sched/Documentation: Update wake_up() & co. memory-barrier guarantees
locking/spinlock, sched/core: Clarify requirements for smp_mb__after_spinlock()
sched/core: Use smp_mb() in wake_woken_function()
tools/memory-model: Add informal LKMM documentation to MAINTAINERS
locking/atomics/Documentation: Describe atomic_set() as a write operation
tools/memory-model: Make scripts executable
tools/memory-model: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() from model
tools/memory-model: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() from recipes
locking/memory-barriers.txt/kokr: Update Korean translation to fix broken DMA vs. MMIO ordering example
MAINTAINERS: Add Daniel Lustig as an LKMM reviewer
tools/memory-model: Fix ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce name
tools/memory-model: Add litmus test for full multicopy atomicity
locking/refcount: Always allow checked forms
...
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/completion.c | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 71 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/wait.c | 55 |
3 files changed, 62 insertions, 72 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/completion.c b/kernel/sched/completion.c index e426b0cb9ac6..a1ad5b7d5521 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/completion.c +++ b/kernel/sched/completion.c @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ * * See also complete_all(), wait_for_completion() and related routines. * - * It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before - * changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up. + * If this function wakes up a task, it executes a full memory barrier before + * accessing the task state. */ void complete(struct completion *x) { @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(complete); * * This will wake up all threads waiting on this particular completion event. * - * It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before - * changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up. + * If this function wakes up a task, it executes a full memory barrier before + * accessing the task state. * * Since complete_all() sets the completion of @x permanently to done * to allow multiple waiters to finish, a call to reinit_completion() diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index deafa9fe602b..d17d99778356 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -406,8 +406,8 @@ void wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task) * its already queued (either by us or someone else) and will get the * wakeup due to that. * - * This cmpxchg() implies a full barrier, which pairs with the write - * barrier implied by the wakeup in wake_up_q(). + * This cmpxchg() executes a full barrier, which pairs with the full + * barrier executed by the wakeup in wake_up_q(). */ if (cmpxchg(&node->next, NULL, WAKE_Q_TAIL)) return; @@ -435,8 +435,8 @@ void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head) task->wake_q.next = NULL; /* - * wake_up_process() implies a wmb() to pair with the queueing - * in wake_q_add() so as not to miss wakeups. + * wake_up_process() executes a full barrier, which pairs with + * the queueing in wake_q_add() so as not to miss wakeups. */ wake_up_process(task); put_task_struct(task); @@ -1859,8 +1859,7 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) * rq(c1)->lock (if not at the same time, then in that order). * C) LOCK of the rq(c1)->lock scheduling in task * - * Transitivity guarantees that B happens after A and C after B. - * Note: we only require RCpc transitivity. + * Release/acquire chaining guarantees that B happens after A and C after B. * Note: the CPU doing B need not be c0 or c1 * * Example: @@ -1922,16 +1921,9 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) * UNLOCK rq(0)->lock * * - * However; for wakeups there is a second guarantee we must provide, namely we - * must observe the state that lead to our wakeup. That is, not only must our - * task observe its own prior state, it must also observe the stores prior to - * its wakeup. - * - * This means that any means of doing remote wakeups must order the CPU doing - * the wakeup against the CPU the task is going to end up running on. This, - * however, is already required for the regular Program-Order guarantee above, - * since the waking CPU is the one issueing the ACQUIRE (smp_cond_load_acquire). - * + * However, for wakeups there is a second guarantee we must provide, namely we + * must ensure that CONDITION=1 done by the caller can not be reordered with + * accesses to the task state; see try_to_wake_up() and set_current_state(). */ /** @@ -1947,6 +1939,9 @@ static void ttwu_queue(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags) * Atomic against schedule() which would dequeue a task, also see * set_current_state(). * + * This function executes a full memory barrier before accessing the task + * state; see set_current_state(). + * * Return: %true if @p->state changes (an actual wakeup was done), * %false otherwise. */ @@ -1978,21 +1973,20 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) * be possible to, falsely, observe p->on_rq == 0 and get stuck * in smp_cond_load_acquire() below. * - * sched_ttwu_pending() try_to_wake_up() - * [S] p->on_rq = 1; [L] P->state - * UNLOCK rq->lock -----. - * \ - * +--- RMB - * schedule() / - * LOCK rq->lock -----' - * UNLOCK rq->lock + * sched_ttwu_pending() try_to_wake_up() + * STORE p->on_rq = 1 LOAD p->state + * UNLOCK rq->lock + * + * __schedule() (switch to task 'p') + * LOCK rq->lock smp_rmb(); + * smp_mb__after_spinlock(); + * UNLOCK rq->lock * * [task p] - * [S] p->state = UNINTERRUPTIBLE [L] p->on_rq + * STORE p->state = UNINTERRUPTIBLE LOAD p->on_rq * - * Pairs with the UNLOCK+LOCK on rq->lock from the - * last wakeup of our task and the schedule that got our task - * current. + * Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in + * __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock(). */ smp_rmb(); if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags)) @@ -2006,15 +2000,17 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags) * One must be running (->on_cpu == 1) in order to remove oneself * from the runqueue. * - * [S] ->on_cpu = 1; [L] ->on_rq - * UNLOCK rq->lock - * RMB - * LOCK rq->lock - * [S] ->on_rq = 0; [L] ->on_cpu + * __schedule() (switch to task 'p') try_to_wake_up() + * STORE p->on_cpu = 1 LOAD p->on_rq + * UNLOCK rq->lock + * + * __schedule() (put 'p' to sleep) + * LOCK rq->lock smp_rmb(); + * smp_mb__after_spinlock(); + * STORE p->on_rq = 0 LOAD p->on_cpu * - * Pairs with the full barrier implied in the UNLOCK+LOCK on rq->lock - * from the consecutive calls to schedule(); the first switching to our - * task, the second putting it to sleep. + * Pairs with the LOCK+smp_mb__after_spinlock() on rq->lock in + * __schedule(). See the comment for smp_mb__after_spinlock(). */ smp_rmb(); @@ -2120,8 +2116,7 @@ out: * * Return: 1 if the process was woken up, 0 if it was already running. * - * It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before - * changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up. + * This function executes a full memory barrier before accessing the task state. */ int wake_up_process(struct task_struct *p) { diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c index 928be527477e..870f97b313e3 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/wait.c +++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c @@ -134,8 +134,8 @@ static void __wake_up_common_lock(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, unsigned int * @nr_exclusive: how many wake-one or wake-many threads to wake up * @key: is directly passed to the wakeup function * - * It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before - * changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up. + * If this function wakes up a task, it executes a full memory barrier before + * accessing the task state. */ void __wake_up(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, unsigned int mode, int nr_exclusive, void *key) @@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__wake_up_locked_key_bookmark); * * On UP it can prevent extra preemption. * - * It may be assumed that this function implies a write memory barrier before - * changing the task state if and only if any tasks are woken up. + * If this function wakes up a task, it executes a full memory barrier before + * accessing the task state. */ void __wake_up_sync_key(struct wait_queue_head *wq_head, unsigned int mode, int nr_exclusive, void *key) @@ -392,35 +392,36 @@ static inline bool is_kthread_should_stop(void) * if (condition) * break; * - * p->state = mode; condition = true; - * smp_mb(); // A smp_wmb(); // C - * if (!wq_entry->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN) wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; - * schedule() try_to_wake_up(); - * p->state = TASK_RUNNING; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - * wq_entry->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; condition = true; - * smp_mb() // B smp_wmb(); // C - * wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; - * } - * remove_wait_queue(&wq_head, &wait); + * // in wait_woken() // in woken_wake_function() * + * p->state = mode; wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; + * smp_mb(); // A try_to_wake_up(): + * if (!(wq_entry->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN)) <full barrier> + * schedule() if (p->state & mode) + * p->state = TASK_RUNNING; p->state = TASK_RUNNING; + * wq_entry->flags &= ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + * smp_mb(); // B condition = true; + * } smp_mb(); // C + * remove_wait_queue(&wq_head, &wait); wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; */ long wait_woken(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, unsigned mode, long timeout) { - set_current_state(mode); /* A */ /* - * The above implies an smp_mb(), which matches with the smp_wmb() from - * woken_wake_function() such that if we observe WQ_FLAG_WOKEN we must - * also observe all state before the wakeup. + * The below executes an smp_mb(), which matches with the full barrier + * executed by the try_to_wake_up() in woken_wake_function() such that + * either we see the store to wq_entry->flags in woken_wake_function() + * or woken_wake_function() sees our store to current->state. */ + set_current_state(mode); /* A */ if (!(wq_entry->flags & WQ_FLAG_WOKEN) && !is_kthread_should_stop()) timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout); __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); /* - * The below implies an smp_mb(), it too pairs with the smp_wmb() from - * woken_wake_function() such that we must either observe the wait - * condition being true _OR_ WQ_FLAG_WOKEN such that we will not miss - * an event. + * The below executes an smp_mb(), which matches with the smp_mb() (C) + * in woken_wake_function() such that either we see the wait condition + * being true or the store to wq_entry->flags in woken_wake_function() + * follows ours in the coherence order. */ smp_store_mb(wq_entry->flags, wq_entry->flags & ~WQ_FLAG_WOKEN); /* B */ @@ -430,14 +431,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(wait_woken); int woken_wake_function(struct wait_queue_entry *wq_entry, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key) { - /* - * Although this function is called under waitqueue lock, LOCK - * doesn't imply write barrier and the users expects write - * barrier semantics on wakeup functions. The following - * smp_wmb() is equivalent to smp_wmb() in try_to_wake_up() - * and is paired with smp_store_mb() in wait_woken(). - */ - smp_wmb(); /* C */ + /* Pairs with the smp_store_mb() in wait_woken(). */ + smp_mb(); /* C */ wq_entry->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN; return default_wake_function(wq_entry, mode, sync, key); |