diff options
| author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2017-09-07 17:03:51 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2017-09-12 17:41:04 +0200 |
| commit | edd8e41d2e3cbd6ebe13ead30eb1adc6f48cbb33 (patch) | |
| tree | 3a7dca8c3058d0513b20657e4f1eb30506876f5f /kernel/sched | |
| parent | 2800486ee34825d954f64c6f98037daea328f121 (diff) | |
| download | linux-edd8e41d2e3cbd6ebe13ead30eb1adc6f48cbb33.tar.bz2 | |
sched/fair: Plug hole between hotplug and active_load_balance()
The load balancer applies cpu_active_mask to whatever sched_domains it
finds, however in the case of active_balance there is a hole between
setting rq->{active_balance,push_cpu} and running the stop_machine
work doing the actual migration.
The @push_cpu can go offline in this window, which would result in us
moving a task onto a dead cpu, which is a fairly bad thing.
Double check the active mask before the stop work does the migration.
CPU0 CPU1
<SoftIRQ>
stop_machine(takedown_cpu)
load_balance() cpu_stopper_thread()
... work = multi_cpu_stop
stop_one_cpu_nowait( /* wait for CPU0 */
.func = active_load_balance_cpu_stop
);
</SoftIRQ>
cpu_stopper_thread()
work = multi_cpu_stop
/* sync with CPU1 */
take_cpu_down()
<idle>
play_dead();
work = active_load_balance_cpu_stop
set_task_cpu(p, CPU1); /* oops!! */
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170907150614.044460912@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 3bcea40d3029..efeebed935ae 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -8560,6 +8560,13 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data) struct rq_flags rf; rq_lock_irq(busiest_rq, &rf); + /* + * Between queueing the stop-work and running it is a hole in which + * CPUs can become inactive. We should not move tasks from or to + * inactive CPUs. + */ + if (!cpu_active(busiest_cpu) || !cpu_active(target_cpu)) + goto out_unlock; /* make sure the requested cpu hasn't gone down in the meantime */ if (unlikely(busiest_cpu != smp_processor_id() || |