diff options
author | Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> | 2009-09-23 15:56:44 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2009-09-24 07:20:59 -0700 |
commit | a7f0765edfd53aed09cb7b0e15863688b39447de (patch) | |
tree | c89adfe418f9988ad4044e0f22827458bdf6b155 /kernel/ptrace.c | |
parent | 1dd3a27326d307952f8ad2499478c84dc7311517 (diff) | |
download | linux-a7f0765edfd53aed09cb7b0e15863688b39447de.tar.bz2 |
ptrace: __ptrace_detach: do __wake_up_parent() if we reap the tracee
The bug is old, it wasn't cause by recent changes.
Test case:
static void *tfunc(void *arg)
{
int pid = (long)arg;
assert(ptrace(PTRACE_ATTACH, pid, NULL, NULL) == 0);
kill(pid, SIGKILL);
sleep(1);
return NULL;
}
int main(void)
{
pthread_t th;
long pid = fork();
if (!pid)
pause();
signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN);
assert(pthread_create(&th, NULL, tfunc, (void*)pid) == 0);
int r = waitpid(-1, NULL, __WNOTHREAD);
printf("waitpid: %d %m\n", r);
return 0;
}
Before the patch this program hangs, after this patch waitpid() correctly
fails with errno == -ECHILD.
The problem is, __ptrace_detach() reaps the EXIT_ZOMBIE tracee if its
->real_parent is our sub-thread and we ignore SIGCHLD. But in this case
we should wake up other threads which can sleep in do_wait().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/ptrace.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/ptrace.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c index 307c285af59e..23bd09cd042e 100644 --- a/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -266,9 +266,10 @@ static int ignoring_children(struct sighand_struct *sigh) * or self-reaping. Do notification now if it would have happened earlier. * If it should reap itself, return true. * - * If it's our own child, there is no notification to do. - * But if our normal children self-reap, then this child - * was prevented by ptrace and we must reap it now. + * If it's our own child, there is no notification to do. But if our normal + * children self-reap, then this child was prevented by ptrace and we must + * reap it now, in that case we must also wake up sub-threads sleeping in + * do_wait(). */ static bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p) { @@ -278,8 +279,10 @@ static bool __ptrace_detach(struct task_struct *tracer, struct task_struct *p) if (!task_detached(p) && thread_group_empty(p)) { if (!same_thread_group(p->real_parent, tracer)) do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal); - else if (ignoring_children(tracer->sighand)) + else if (ignoring_children(tracer->sighand)) { + __wake_up_parent(p, tracer); p->exit_signal = -1; + } } if (task_detached(p)) { /* Mark it as in the process of being reaped. */ |