diff options
author | Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> | 2020-01-08 16:35:03 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2020-01-09 08:46:18 -0800 |
commit | 27ae7997a66174cb8afd6a75b3989f5e0c1b9e5a (patch) | |
tree | cd309990484990799c2577f51cf027941ebd4b0c /kernel/bpf/verifier.c | |
parent | 976aba002fcb4b1baa71e4b0854f3d4ae48c1d4d (diff) | |
download | linux-27ae7997a66174cb8afd6a75b3989f5e0c1b9e5a.tar.bz2 |
bpf: Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS
This patch allows the kernel's struct ops (i.e. func ptr) to be
implemented in BPF. The first use case in this series is the
"struct tcp_congestion_ops" which will be introduced in a
latter patch.
This patch introduces a new prog type BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS.
The BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog is verified against a particular
func ptr of a kernel struct. The attr->attach_btf_id is the btf id
of a kernel struct. The attr->expected_attach_type is the member
"index" of that kernel struct. The first member of a struct starts
with member index 0. That will avoid ambiguity when a kernel struct
has multiple func ptrs with the same func signature.
For example, a BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog is written
to implement the "init" func ptr of the "struct tcp_congestion_ops".
The attr->attach_btf_id is the btf id of the "struct tcp_congestion_ops"
of the _running_ kernel. The attr->expected_attach_type is 3.
The ctx of BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS is an array of u64 args saved
by arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline that will be done in the next
patch when introducing BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS.
"struct bpf_struct_ops" is introduced as a common interface for the kernel
struct that supports BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog. The supporting kernel
struct will need to implement an instance of the "struct bpf_struct_ops".
The supporting kernel struct also needs to implement a bpf_verifier_ops.
During BPF_PROG_LOAD, bpf_struct_ops_find() will find the right
bpf_verifier_ops by searching the attr->attach_btf_id.
A new "btf_struct_access" is also added to the bpf_verifier_ops such
that the supporting kernel struct can optionally provide its own specific
check on accessing the func arg (e.g. provide limited write access).
After btf_vmlinux is parsed, the new bpf_struct_ops_init() is called
to initialize some values (e.g. the btf id of the supporting kernel
struct) and it can only be done once the btf_vmlinux is available.
The R0 checks at BPF_EXIT is excluded for the BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS prog
if the return type of the prog->aux->attach_func_proto is "void".
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200109003503.3855825-1-kafai@fb.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 134 |
1 files changed, 104 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index d433d70022fd..586ed3c94b80 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2859,11 +2859,6 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 btf_id; int ret; - if (atype != BPF_READ) { - verbose(env, "only read is supported\n"); - return -EACCES; - } - if (off < 0) { verbose(env, "R%d is ptr_%s invalid negative access: off=%d\n", @@ -2880,17 +2875,32 @@ static int check_ptr_to_btf_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; } - ret = btf_struct_access(&env->log, t, off, size, atype, &btf_id); + if (env->ops->btf_struct_access) { + ret = env->ops->btf_struct_access(&env->log, t, off, size, + atype, &btf_id); + } else { + if (atype != BPF_READ) { + verbose(env, "only read is supported\n"); + return -EACCES; + } + + ret = btf_struct_access(&env->log, t, off, size, atype, + &btf_id); + } + if (ret < 0) return ret; - if (ret == SCALAR_VALUE) { - mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); - return 0; + if (atype == BPF_READ) { + if (ret == SCALAR_VALUE) { + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); + return 0; + } + mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, value_regno); + regs[value_regno].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID; + regs[value_regno].btf_id = btf_id; } - mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, value_regno); - regs[value_regno].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID; - regs[value_regno].btf_id = btf_id; + return 0; } @@ -6349,8 +6359,30 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { struct tnum enforce_attach_type_range = tnum_unknown; + const struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog; struct bpf_reg_state *reg; struct tnum range = tnum_range(0, 1); + int err; + + /* The struct_ops func-ptr's return type could be "void" */ + if (env->prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS && + !prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type) + return 0; + + /* eBPF calling convetion is such that R0 is used + * to return the value from eBPF program. + * Make sure that it's readable at this time + * of bpf_exit, which means that program wrote + * something into it earlier + */ + err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP); + if (err) + return err; + + if (is_pointer_value(env, BPF_REG_0)) { + verbose(env, "R0 leaks addr as return value\n"); + return -EACCES; + } switch (env->prog->type) { case BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR: @@ -8016,21 +8048,6 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (err) return err; - /* eBPF calling convetion is such that R0 is used - * to return the value from eBPF program. - * Make sure that it's readable at this time - * of bpf_exit, which means that program wrote - * something into it earlier - */ - err = check_reg_arg(env, BPF_REG_0, SRC_OP); - if (err) - return err; - - if (is_pointer_value(env, BPF_REG_0)) { - verbose(env, "R0 leaks addr as return value\n"); - return -EACCES; - } - err = check_return_code(env); if (err) return err; @@ -8829,12 +8846,14 @@ static int convert_ctx_accesses(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) convert_ctx_access = bpf_xdp_sock_convert_ctx_access; break; case PTR_TO_BTF_ID: - if (type == BPF_WRITE) { + if (type == BPF_READ) { + insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | + BPF_SIZE((insn)->code); + env->prog->aux->num_exentries++; + } else if (env->prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) { verbose(env, "Writes through BTF pointers are not allowed\n"); return -EINVAL; } - insn->code = BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_SIZE((insn)->code); - env->prog->aux->num_exentries++; continue; default: continue; @@ -9502,6 +9521,58 @@ static void print_verification_stats(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) env->peak_states, env->longest_mark_read_walk); } +static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + const struct btf_type *t, *func_proto; + const struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops; + const struct btf_member *member; + struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog; + u32 btf_id, member_idx; + const char *mname; + + btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id; + st_ops = bpf_struct_ops_find(btf_id); + if (!st_ops) { + verbose(env, "attach_btf_id %u is not a supported struct\n", + btf_id); + return -ENOTSUPP; + } + + t = st_ops->type; + member_idx = prog->expected_attach_type; + if (member_idx >= btf_type_vlen(t)) { + verbose(env, "attach to invalid member idx %u of struct %s\n", + member_idx, st_ops->name); + return -EINVAL; + } + + member = &btf_type_member(t)[member_idx]; + mname = btf_name_by_offset(btf_vmlinux, member->name_off); + func_proto = btf_type_resolve_func_ptr(btf_vmlinux, member->type, + NULL); + if (!func_proto) { + verbose(env, "attach to invalid member %s(@idx %u) of struct %s\n", + mname, member_idx, st_ops->name); + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (st_ops->check_member) { + int err = st_ops->check_member(t, member); + + if (err) { + verbose(env, "attach to unsupported member %s of struct %s\n", + mname, st_ops->name); + return err; + } + } + + prog->aux->attach_func_proto = func_proto; + prog->aux->attach_func_name = mname; + env->ops = st_ops->verifier_ops; + + return 0; +} + static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog; @@ -9517,6 +9588,9 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) long addr; u64 key; + if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) + return check_struct_ops_btf_id(env); + if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING) return 0; |