diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2016-11-22 11:29:28 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2016-11-22 13:27:16 -0500 |
commit | f9aa9dc7d2d00e6eb02168ffc64ef614b89d7998 (patch) | |
tree | 061b767ccf7d6955cc4fb921c230a787d194392e /kernel/bpf/verifier.c | |
parent | 06b37b650cf826349677564cb0ff1560ed8e51fc (diff) | |
parent | 3b404a519815b9820f73f1ecf404e5546c9270ba (diff) | |
download | linux-f9aa9dc7d2d00e6eb02168ffc64ef614b89d7998.tar.bz2 |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net
All conflicts were simple overlapping changes except perhaps
for the Thunder driver.
That driver has a change_mtu method explicitly for sending
a message to the hardware. If that fails it returns an
error.
Normally a driver doesn't need an ndo_change_mtu method becuase those
are usually just range changes, which are now handled generically.
But since this extra operation is needed in the Thunder driver, it has
to stay.
However, if the message send fails we have to restore the original
MTU before the change because the entire call chain expects that if
an error is thrown by ndo_change_mtu then the MTU did not change.
Therefore code is added to nicvf_change_mtu to remember the original
MTU, and to restore it upon nicvf_update_hw_max_frs() failue.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 70 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 89f787ca47ef..8740c5fa02fc 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state) reg->map_ptr->value_size, reg->id); if (reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) - verbose(",min_value=%llu", - (unsigned long long)reg->min_value); + verbose(",min_value=%lld", + (long long)reg->min_value); if (reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) verbose(",max_value=%llu", (unsigned long long)reg->max_value); @@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, * index'es we need to make sure that whatever we use * will have a set floor within our range. */ - if ((s64)reg->min_value < 0) { + if (reg->min_value < 0) { verbose("R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n", regno); return -EACCES; @@ -1490,7 +1490,8 @@ static void check_reg_overflow(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { if (reg->max_value > BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; - if ((s64)reg->min_value < BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) + if (reg->min_value < BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE || + reg->min_value > BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; } @@ -1498,7 +1499,8 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg; - u64 min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE, max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + s64 min_val = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; + u64 max_val = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); dst_reg = ®s[insn->dst_reg]; @@ -1532,22 +1534,43 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return; } + /* If one of our values was at the end of our ranges then we can't just + * do our normal operations to the register, we need to set the values + * to the min/max since they are undefined. + */ + if (min_val == BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) + dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; + if (max_val == BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) + dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; + switch (opcode) { case BPF_ADD: - dst_reg->min_value += min_val; - dst_reg->max_value += max_val; + if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) + dst_reg->min_value += min_val; + if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) + dst_reg->max_value += max_val; break; case BPF_SUB: - dst_reg->min_value -= min_val; - dst_reg->max_value -= max_val; + if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) + dst_reg->min_value -= min_val; + if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) + dst_reg->max_value -= max_val; break; case BPF_MUL: - dst_reg->min_value *= min_val; - dst_reg->max_value *= max_val; + if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) + dst_reg->min_value *= min_val; + if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) + dst_reg->max_value *= max_val; break; case BPF_AND: - /* & is special since it could end up with 0 bits set. */ - dst_reg->min_value &= min_val; + /* Disallow AND'ing of negative numbers, ain't nobody got time + * for that. Otherwise the minimum is 0 and the max is the max + * value we could AND against. + */ + if (min_val < 0) + dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; + else + dst_reg->min_value = 0; dst_reg->max_value = max_val; break; case BPF_LSH: @@ -1557,24 +1580,25 @@ static void adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, */ if (min_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; - else + else if (dst_reg->min_value != BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE) dst_reg->min_value <<= min_val; if (max_val > ilog2(BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE)) dst_reg->max_value = BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE; - else + else if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) dst_reg->max_value <<= max_val; break; case BPF_RSH: - dst_reg->min_value >>= min_val; - dst_reg->max_value >>= max_val; - break; - case BPF_MOD: - /* % is special since it is an unsigned modulus, so the floor - * will always be 0. + /* RSH by a negative number is undefined, and the BPF_RSH is an + * unsigned shift, so make the appropriate casts. */ - dst_reg->min_value = 0; - dst_reg->max_value = max_val - 1; + if (min_val < 0 || dst_reg->min_value < 0) + dst_reg->min_value = BPF_REGISTER_MIN_RANGE; + else + dst_reg->min_value = + (u64)(dst_reg->min_value) >> min_val; + if (dst_reg->max_value != BPF_REGISTER_MAX_RANGE) + dst_reg->max_value >>= max_val; break; default: reset_reg_range_values(regs, insn->dst_reg); |