summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf/btf.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>2022-01-27 07:46:06 -0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-01-27 12:03:46 -0800
commitc6f1bfe89ac95dc829dcb4ed54780da134ac5fce (patch)
treed6d304eb322a72bab4b8d8b88a945a7fdb47b330 /kernel/bpf/btf.c
parent7472d5a642c94a0ee1882ff3038de72ffe803a01 (diff)
downloadlinux-c6f1bfe89ac95dc829dcb4ed54780da134ac5fce.tar.bz2
bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way
BPF verifier supports direct memory access for BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING type of bpf programs, e.g., a->b. If "a" is a pointer pointing to kernel memory, bpf verifier will allow user to write code in C like a->b and the verifier will translate it to a kernel load properly. If "a" is a pointer to user memory, it is expected that bpf developer should be bpf_probe_read_user() helper to get the value a->b. Without utilizing BTF __user tagging information, current verifier will assume that a->b is a kernel memory access and this may generate incorrect result. Now BTF contains __user information, it can check whether the pointer points to a user memory or not. If it is, the verifier can reject the program and force users to use bpf_probe_read_user() helper explicitly. In the future, we can easily extend btf_add_space for other address space tagging, for example, rcu/percpu etc. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220127154606.654961-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/btf.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/btf.c34
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index b2a248956100..b983cee8d196 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -4886,6 +4886,7 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
const char *tname = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
struct bpf_verifier_log *log = info->log;
const struct btf_param *args;
+ const char *tag_value;
u32 nr_args, arg;
int i, ret;
@@ -5038,6 +5039,13 @@ bool btf_ctx_access(int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type type,
info->btf = btf;
info->btf_id = t->type;
t = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
+
+ if (btf_type_is_type_tag(t)) {
+ tag_value = __btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
+ if (strcmp(tag_value, "user") == 0)
+ info->reg_type |= MEM_USER;
+ }
+
/* skip modifiers */
while (btf_type_is_modifier(t)) {
info->btf_id = t->type;
@@ -5064,12 +5072,12 @@ enum bpf_struct_walk_result {
static int btf_struct_walk(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
- u32 *next_btf_id)
+ u32 *next_btf_id, enum bpf_type_flag *flag)
{
u32 i, moff, mtrue_end, msize = 0, total_nelems = 0;
const struct btf_type *mtype, *elem_type = NULL;
const struct btf_member *member;
- const char *tname, *mname;
+ const char *tname, *mname, *tag_value;
u32 vlen, elem_id, mid;
again:
@@ -5253,7 +5261,8 @@ error:
}
if (btf_type_is_ptr(mtype)) {
- const struct btf_type *stype;
+ const struct btf_type *stype, *t;
+ enum bpf_type_flag tmp_flag = 0;
u32 id;
if (msize != size || off != moff) {
@@ -5262,9 +5271,19 @@ error:
mname, moff, tname, off, size);
return -EACCES;
}
+
+ /* check __user tag */
+ t = btf_type_by_id(btf, mtype->type);
+ if (btf_type_is_type_tag(t)) {
+ tag_value = __btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
+ if (strcmp(tag_value, "user") == 0)
+ tmp_flag = MEM_USER;
+ }
+
stype = btf_type_skip_modifiers(btf, mtype->type, &id);
if (btf_type_is_struct(stype)) {
*next_btf_id = id;
+ *flag = tmp_flag;
return WALK_PTR;
}
}
@@ -5291,13 +5310,14 @@ error:
int btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
const struct btf_type *t, int off, int size,
enum bpf_access_type atype __maybe_unused,
- u32 *next_btf_id)
+ u32 *next_btf_id, enum bpf_type_flag *flag)
{
+ enum bpf_type_flag tmp_flag = 0;
int err;
u32 id;
do {
- err = btf_struct_walk(log, btf, t, off, size, &id);
+ err = btf_struct_walk(log, btf, t, off, size, &id, &tmp_flag);
switch (err) {
case WALK_PTR:
@@ -5305,6 +5325,7 @@ int btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, const struct btf *btf,
* we're done.
*/
*next_btf_id = id;
+ *flag = tmp_flag;
return PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
case WALK_SCALAR:
return SCALAR_VALUE;
@@ -5349,6 +5370,7 @@ bool btf_struct_ids_match(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
const struct btf *need_btf, u32 need_type_id)
{
const struct btf_type *type;
+ enum bpf_type_flag flag;
int err;
/* Are we already done? */
@@ -5359,7 +5381,7 @@ again:
type = btf_type_by_id(btf, id);
if (!type)
return false;
- err = btf_struct_walk(log, btf, type, off, 1, &id);
+ err = btf_struct_walk(log, btf, type, off, 1, &id, &flag);
if (err != WALK_STRUCT)
return false;