summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/ipc/sem.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@bull.net>2008-02-06 01:36:23 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@woody.linux-foundation.org>2008-02-06 10:41:01 -0800
commitb1ed88b47f5e18c6efb8041275c16eeead5377df (patch)
tree3861cbdbac7289a790adf5f950c1921fb1692f6c /ipc/sem.c
parent15aafa2f9d8399b22e418c53a87dfc0c43f4030f (diff)
downloadlinux-b1ed88b47f5e18c6efb8041275c16eeead5377df.tar.bz2
IPC: fix error check in all new xxx_lock() and xxx_exit_ns() functions
In the new implementation of the [sem|shm|msg]_lock[_check]() routines, we use the return value of ipc_lock() in container_of() without any check. But ipc_lock may return a errcode. The use of this errcode in container_of() may alter this errcode, and we don't want this. And in xxx_exit_ns, the pointer return by idr_find is of type 'struct kern_ipc_per'... Today, the code will work as is because the member used in these container_of() is the first member of its container (offset == 0), the errcode isn't changed then. But in the general case, we can't count on this assumption and this may lead later to a real bug if we don't correct this. Again, the proposed solution is simple and correct. But, as pointed by Nadia, with this solution, the same check will be done several times (in all sub-callers...), what is not very funny/optimal... Signed-off-by: Pierre Peiffer <pierre.peiffer@bull.net> Cc: Nadia Derbey <Nadia.Derbey@bull.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'ipc/sem.c')
-rw-r--r--ipc/sem.c17
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index 35952c0bae46..d65e285b7e30 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ int sem_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
void sem_exit_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
{
struct sem_array *sma;
+ struct kern_ipc_perm *perm;
int next_id;
int total, in_use;
@@ -151,10 +152,11 @@ void sem_exit_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
in_use = sem_ids(ns).in_use;
for (total = 0, next_id = 0; total < in_use; next_id++) {
- sma = idr_find(&sem_ids(ns).ipcs_idr, next_id);
- if (sma == NULL)
+ perm = idr_find(&sem_ids(ns).ipcs_idr, next_id);
+ if (perm == NULL)
continue;
- ipc_lock_by_ptr(&sma->sem_perm);
+ ipc_lock_by_ptr(perm);
+ sma = container_of(perm, struct sem_array, sem_perm);
freeary(ns, sma);
total++;
}
@@ -181,6 +183,9 @@ static inline struct sem_array *sem_lock_check_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
{
struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock_check_down(&sem_ids(ns), id);
+ if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
+ return (struct sem_array *)ipcp;
+
return container_of(ipcp, struct sem_array, sem_perm);
}
@@ -192,6 +197,9 @@ static inline struct sem_array *sem_lock(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
{
struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock(&sem_ids(ns), id);
+ if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
+ return (struct sem_array *)ipcp;
+
return container_of(ipcp, struct sem_array, sem_perm);
}
@@ -200,6 +208,9 @@ static inline struct sem_array *sem_lock_check(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
{
struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = ipc_lock_check(&sem_ids(ns), id);
+ if (IS_ERR(ipcp))
+ return (struct sem_array *)ipcp;
+
return container_of(ipcp, struct sem_array, sem_perm);
}