diff options
author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2018-04-30 14:51:01 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2018-05-04 07:54:54 +0200 |
commit | b5bf9a90bbebffba888c9144c5a8a10317b04064 (patch) | |
tree | 4c059f0785c26ca66df0009544a23b68f7228be3 /include | |
parent | 85f1abe0019fcb3ea10df7029056cf42702283a8 (diff) | |
download | linux-b5bf9a90bbebffba888c9144c5a8a10317b04064.tar.bz2 |
sched/core: Introduce set_special_state()
Gaurav reported a perceived problem with TASK_PARKED, which turned out
to be a broken wait-loop pattern in __kthread_parkme(), but the
reported issue can (and does) in fact happen for states that do not do
condition based sleeps.
When the 'current->state = TASK_RUNNING' store of a previous
(concurrent) try_to_wake_up() collides with the setting of a 'special'
sleep state, we can loose the sleep state.
Normal condition based wait-loops are immune to this problem, but for
sleep states that are not condition based are subject to this problem.
There already is a fix for TASK_DEAD. Abstract that and also apply it
to TASK_STOPPED and TASK_TRACED, both of which are also without
condition based wait-loop.
Reported-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/sched.h | 50 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/sched/signal.h | 2 |
2 files changed, 46 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index b3d697f3b573..c2413703f45d 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -112,17 +112,36 @@ struct task_group; #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP +/* + * Special states are those that do not use the normal wait-loop pattern. See + * the comment with set_special_state(). + */ +#define is_special_task_state(state) \ + ((state) & (__TASK_STOPPED | __TASK_TRACED | TASK_DEAD)) + #define __set_current_state(state_value) \ do { \ + WARN_ON_ONCE(is_special_task_state(state_value));\ current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \ current->state = (state_value); \ } while (0) + #define set_current_state(state_value) \ do { \ + WARN_ON_ONCE(is_special_task_state(state_value));\ current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \ smp_store_mb(current->state, (state_value)); \ } while (0) +#define set_special_state(state_value) \ + do { \ + unsigned long flags; /* may shadow */ \ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_special_task_state(state_value)); \ + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); \ + current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \ + current->state = (state_value); \ + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); \ + } while (0) #else /* * set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of current->state @@ -144,8 +163,8 @@ struct task_group; * * The above is typically ordered against the wakeup, which does: * - * need_sleep = false; - * wake_up_state(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + * need_sleep = false; + * wake_up_state(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); * * Where wake_up_state() (and all other wakeup primitives) imply enough * barriers to order the store of the variable against wakeup. @@ -154,12 +173,33 @@ struct task_group; * once it observes the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE store the waking CPU can issue a * TASK_RUNNING store which can collide with __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING). * - * This is obviously fine, since they both store the exact same value. + * However, with slightly different timing the wakeup TASK_RUNNING store can + * also collide with the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE store. Loosing that store is not + * a problem either because that will result in one extra go around the loop + * and our @cond test will save the day. * * Also see the comments of try_to_wake_up(). */ -#define __set_current_state(state_value) do { current->state = (state_value); } while (0) -#define set_current_state(state_value) smp_store_mb(current->state, (state_value)) +#define __set_current_state(state_value) \ + current->state = (state_value) + +#define set_current_state(state_value) \ + smp_store_mb(current->state, (state_value)) + +/* + * set_special_state() should be used for those states when the blocking task + * can not use the regular condition based wait-loop. In that case we must + * serialize against wakeups such that any possible in-flight TASK_RUNNING stores + * will not collide with our state change. + */ +#define set_special_state(state_value) \ + do { \ + unsigned long flags; /* may shadow */ \ + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags); \ + current->state = (state_value); \ + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags); \ + } while (0) + #endif /* Task command name length: */ diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h index a7ce74c74e49..113d1ad1ced7 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h +++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static inline void kernel_signal_stop(void) { spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); if (current->jobctl & JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED) - __set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED); + set_special_state(TASK_STOPPED); spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); schedule(); |