diff options
| author | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> | 2020-04-07 15:30:02 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> | 2020-04-27 16:29:41 +0530 |
| commit | a5bff92eaac45bdf6221badf9505c26792fdf99e (patch) | |
| tree | a12728f7c2d44acebd9711ee52ea8c89c3e72cf0 /include | |
| parent | 6292b8efe32e6be408af364132f09572aed14382 (diff) | |
| download | linux-a5bff92eaac45bdf6221badf9505c26792fdf99e.tar.bz2 | |
dma-buf: Fix SET_NAME ioctl uapi
The uapi is the same on 32 and 64 bit, but the number isn't. Everyone
who botched this please re-read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.4-preprc-cpu/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.html
Also, the type argument for the ioctl macros is for the type the void
__user *arg pointer points at, which in this case would be the
variable-sized char[] of a 0 terminated string. So this was botched in
more than just the usual ways.
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: Chenbo Feng <fengc@google.com>
Cc: Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Cc: minchan@kernel.org
Cc: surenb@google.com
Cc: jenhaochen@google.com
Cc: Martin Liu <liumartin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Tested-by: Martin Liu <liumartin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Liu <liumartin@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
[sumits: updated some checkpatch fixes, corrected author email]
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200407133002.3486387-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h index dbc7092e04b5..7f30393b92c3 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/dma-buf.h @@ -39,6 +39,12 @@ struct dma_buf_sync { #define DMA_BUF_BASE 'b' #define DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 0, struct dma_buf_sync) + +/* 32/64bitness of this uapi was botched in android, there's no difference + * between them in actual uapi, they're just different numbers. + */ #define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, const char *) +#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_A _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u32) +#define DMA_BUF_SET_NAME_B _IOW(DMA_BUF_BASE, 1, u64) #endif |