diff options
author | Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> | 2021-10-20 20:58:50 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2021-10-21 12:14:29 +0100 |
commit | 0da1a1c4891188f456c7790940e47c8043bc7c9b (patch) | |
tree | 5670432ae47ee2f03ce1fc84213d3cfa559fa682 /include/soc/mscc | |
parent | 90e0aa8d108d22cb0dd646083fb3dfcc7a43a018 (diff) | |
download | linux-0da1a1c4891188f456c7790940e47c8043bc7c9b.tar.bz2 |
net: mscc: ocelot: allow a config where all bridge VLANs are egress-untagged
At present, the ocelot driver accepts a single egress-untagged bridge
VLAN, meaning that this sequence of operations:
ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
ip link set swp0 master br0
bridge vlan add dev swp0 vid 2 pvid untagged
fails because the bridge automatically installs VID 1 as a pvid & untagged
VLAN, and vid 2 would be the second untagged VLAN on this port. It is
necessary to delete VID 1 before proceeding to add VID 2.
This limitation comes from the fact that we operate the port tag, when
it has an egress-untagged VID, in the OCELOT_PORT_TAG_NATIVE mode.
The ocelot switches do not have full flexibility and can either have one
single VID as egress-untagged, or all of them.
There are use cases for having all VLANs as egress-untagged as well, and
this patch adds support for that.
The change rewrites ocelot_port_set_native_vlan() into a more generic
ocelot_port_manage_port_tag() function. Because the software bridge's
state, transmitted to us via switchdev, can become very complex, we
don't attempt to track all possible state transitions, but instead take
a more declarative approach and just make ocelot_port_manage_port_tag()
figure out which more to operate in:
- port is VLAN-unaware: the classified VLAN (internal, unrelated to the
802.1Q header) is not inserted into packets on egress
- port is VLAN-aware:
- port has tagged VLANs:
-> port has no untagged VLAN: set up as pure trunk
-> port has one untagged VLAN: set up as trunk port + native VLAN
-> port has more than one untagged VLAN: this is an invalid config
which is rejected by ocelot_vlan_prepare
- port has no tagged VLANs
-> set up as pure egress-untagged port
We don't keep the number of tagged and untagged VLANs, we just count the
structures we keep.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/soc/mscc')
-rw-r--r-- | include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h | 3 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h index 9f2ea7995075..b8b1ac943b44 100644 --- a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h +++ b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h @@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ struct ocelot_vlan { struct ocelot_bridge_vlan { u16 vid; unsigned long portmask; + unsigned long untagged; struct list_head list; }; @@ -608,8 +609,6 @@ struct ocelot_port { bool vlan_aware; /* VLAN that untagged frames are classified to, on ingress */ struct ocelot_vlan pvid_vlan; - /* The VLAN ID that will be transmitted as untagged, on egress */ - struct ocelot_vlan native_vlan; unsigned int ptp_skbs_in_flight; u8 ptp_cmd; |