summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/asm-arm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDeepak Saxena <dsaxena@net.rmk.(none)>2005-06-03 20:52:25 +0100
committerRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>2005-06-03 20:52:25 +0100
commit4ab5c01c7cc28f29d5cf5f2a591cb6f7bbece48e (patch)
treed69fc21d2dbba664249efe6394213a11a119dcc1 /include/asm-arm
parenteff910a91ac04ab1d9e210d4f721484af3b39c8d (diff)
downloadlinux-4ab5c01c7cc28f29d5cf5f2a591cb6f7bbece48e.tar.bz2
[PATCH] ARM: 2692/1: Fix compile warnings in include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h
Patch from Deepak Saxena This patch fixes the following warnings: include/asm/arch/io.h: In function `insw': include/asm/arch/io.h:78: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks acast include/asm/arch/io.h:79: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks acast include/asm/arch/io.h: In function `outsw': include/asm/arch/io.h:103: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast include/asm/arch/io.h:104: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast include/asm/arch/io.h: In function `inw': include/asm/arch/io.h:127: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast Signed-off-by: Deepak Saxena Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/asm-arm')
-rw-r--r--include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h16
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h b/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h
index a8e3c2daefd6..083462668e18 100644
--- a/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h
+++ b/include/asm-arm/arch-ixp2000/io.h
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ static inline void insw(u32 ptr, void *buf, int length)
* Is this cycle meant for the CS8900?
*/
if ((machine_is_ixdp2401() || machine_is_ixdp2801()) &&
- ((port >= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) &&
- (port <= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) {
+ (((u32)port >= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) &&
+ ((u32)port <= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) {
u8 *buf8 = (u8*)buf;
register u32 tmp32;
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@ static inline void outsw(u32 ptr, void *buf, int length)
* Is this cycle meant for the CS8900?
*/
if ((machine_is_ixdp2401() || machine_is_ixdp2801()) &&
- ((port >= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) &&
- (port <= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) {
+ (((u32)port >= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) &&
+ ((u32)port <= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) {
register u32 tmp32;
u8 *buf8 = (u8*)buf;
do {
@@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ static inline u16 inw(u32 ptr)
* Is this cycle meant for the CS8900?
*/
if ((machine_is_ixdp2401() || machine_is_ixdp2801()) &&
- ((port >= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) &&
- (port <= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) {
+ (((u32)port >= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) &&
+ ((u32)port <= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) {
return (u16)(*port);
}
@@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ static inline void outw(u16 value, u32 ptr)
register volatile u32 *port = (volatile u32 *)ptr;
if ((machine_is_ixdp2401() || machine_is_ixdp2801()) &&
- ((port >= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) &&
- (port <= IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) {
+ (((u32)port >= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_BASE) &&
+ ((u32)port <= (u32)IXDP2X01_CS8900_VIRT_END))) {
*port = value;
return;
}