diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2020-02-11 13:39:10 -0600 |
---|---|---|
committer | Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> | 2020-02-12 08:14:43 +0100 |
commit | 9478bd43a2eb5c72b599368513d10880b296d65f (patch) | |
tree | e6139e2e097d0fa40a6dc486f0ef991a52e31bfc /include/acpi | |
parent | 0e023687ca552147a76540377be4c642b1313d53 (diff) | |
download | linux-9478bd43a2eb5c72b599368513d10880b296d65f.tar.bz2 |
ALSA: core: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211193910.GA4596@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/acpi')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions