diff options
| author | Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> | 2011-05-24 17:11:44 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2011-05-25 08:39:12 -0700 |
| commit | d05f3169c0fbca16132ec7c2be71685c6de638b5 (patch) | |
| tree | 37d82004869fa4e530617883f12cab7538dbd4a6 /fs | |
| parent | 248ac0e1943ad1796393d281b096184719eb3f97 (diff) | |
| download | linux-d05f3169c0fbca16132ec7c2be71685c6de638b5.tar.bz2 | |
mm: make expand_downwards() symmetrical with expand_upwards()
Currently we have expand_upwards exported while expand_downwards is
accessible only via expand_stack or expand_stack_downwards.
check_stack_guard_page is a nice example of the asymmetry. It uses
expand_stack for VM_GROWSDOWN while expand_upwards is called for
VM_GROWSUP case.
Let's clean this up by exporting both functions and make those names
consistent. Let's use expand_{upwards,downwards} because expanding
doesn't always involve stack manipulation (an example is
ia64_do_page_fault which uses expand_upwards for registers backing store
expansion). expand_downwards has to be defined for both
CONFIG_STACK_GROWS{UP,DOWN} because get_arg_page calls the downwards
version in the early process initialization phase for growsup
configuration.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/exec.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index c1cf372f17a7..e276d5e0abb9 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static struct page *get_arg_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pos, #ifdef CONFIG_STACK_GROWSUP if (write) { - ret = expand_stack_downwards(bprm->vma, pos); + ret = expand_downwards(bprm->vma, pos); if (ret < 0) return NULL; } |