summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/xfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>2021-05-26 19:57:42 -0700
committerDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>2021-05-27 08:11:24 -0700
commit991c2c5980fb97ae6194f7c46b44f9446629eb4e (patch)
treee88c4db28b6bdac68535a5fd75da77535b885522 /fs/xfs
parent9f5815315e0b93146d7b0be4d96ee2d74eeabb98 (diff)
downloadlinux-991c2c5980fb97ae6194f7c46b44f9446629eb4e.tar.bz2
xfs: btree format inode forks can have zero extents
xfs/538 is assert failing with this trace when testing with directory block sizes of 64kB: XFS: Assertion failed: !xfs_need_iread_extents(ifp), file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 608 .... Call Trace: xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents+0x2a9/0x470 ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xe7/0x220 __xfs_bunmapi+0x4ca/0xdf0 xfs_bunmapi+0x1a/0x30 xfs_dir2_shrink_inode+0x71/0x210 xfs_dir2_block_to_sf+0x2ae/0x410 xfs_dir2_block_removename+0x21a/0x280 xfs_dir_removename+0x195/0x1d0 xfs_remove+0x244/0x460 xfs_vn_unlink+0x53/0xa0 ? selinux_inode_unlink+0x13/0x20 vfs_unlink+0x117/0x220 do_unlinkat+0x1a2/0x2d0 __x64_sys_unlink+0x42/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x70 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae This is a check to ensure that the extents have been read into memory before we are doing a ifork btree manipulation. This assert is bogus in the above case. We have a fragmented directory block that has more extents in it than can fit in extent format, so the inode data fork is in btree format. xfs_dir2_shrink_inode() asks to remove all remaining 16 filesystem blocks from the inode so it can convert to short form, and __xfs_bunmapi() removes all the extents. We now have a data fork in btree format but have zero extents in the fork. This incorrectly trips the xfs_need_iread_extents() assert because it assumes that an empty extent btree means the extent tree has not been read into memory yet. This is clearly not the case with xfs_bunmapi(), as it has an explicit call to xfs_iread_extents() in it to pull the extents into memory before it starts unmapping. Also, the assert directly after this bogus one is: ASSERT(ifp->if_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE); Which covers the context in which it is legal to call xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents just fine. Hence we should just remove the bogus assert as it is clearly wrong and causes a regression. The returns the test behaviour to the pre-existing assert failure in xfs_dir2_shrink_inode() that indicates xfs_bunmapi() has failed to remove all the extents in the range it was asked to unmap. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs')
-rw-r--r--fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c1
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 7e3b9b01431e..3f8b6da09261 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -605,7 +605,6 @@ xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents(
ASSERT(cur);
ASSERT(whichfork != XFS_COW_FORK);
- ASSERT(!xfs_need_iread_extents(ifp));
ASSERT(ifp->if_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE);
ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(rblock->bb_level) == 1);
ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(rblock->bb_numrecs) == 1);