diff options
author | Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> | 2021-05-26 19:57:42 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> | 2021-05-27 08:11:24 -0700 |
commit | 991c2c5980fb97ae6194f7c46b44f9446629eb4e (patch) | |
tree | e88c4db28b6bdac68535a5fd75da77535b885522 /fs/xfs | |
parent | 9f5815315e0b93146d7b0be4d96ee2d74eeabb98 (diff) | |
download | linux-991c2c5980fb97ae6194f7c46b44f9446629eb4e.tar.bz2 |
xfs: btree format inode forks can have zero extents
xfs/538 is assert failing with this trace when testing with
directory block sizes of 64kB:
XFS: Assertion failed: !xfs_need_iread_extents(ifp), file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c, line: 608
....
Call Trace:
xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents+0x2a9/0x470
? kmem_cache_alloc+0xe7/0x220
__xfs_bunmapi+0x4ca/0xdf0
xfs_bunmapi+0x1a/0x30
xfs_dir2_shrink_inode+0x71/0x210
xfs_dir2_block_to_sf+0x2ae/0x410
xfs_dir2_block_removename+0x21a/0x280
xfs_dir_removename+0x195/0x1d0
xfs_remove+0x244/0x460
xfs_vn_unlink+0x53/0xa0
? selinux_inode_unlink+0x13/0x20
vfs_unlink+0x117/0x220
do_unlinkat+0x1a2/0x2d0
__x64_sys_unlink+0x42/0x60
do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x70
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
This is a check to ensure that the extents have been read into
memory before we are doing a ifork btree manipulation. This assert
is bogus in the above case.
We have a fragmented directory block that has more extents in it
than can fit in extent format, so the inode data fork is in btree
format. xfs_dir2_shrink_inode() asks to remove all remaining 16
filesystem blocks from the inode so it can convert to short form,
and __xfs_bunmapi() removes all the extents. We now have a data fork
in btree format but have zero extents in the fork. This incorrectly
trips the xfs_need_iread_extents() assert because it assumes that an
empty extent btree means the extent tree has not been read into
memory yet. This is clearly not the case with xfs_bunmapi(), as it
has an explicit call to xfs_iread_extents() in it to pull the
extents into memory before it starts unmapping.
Also, the assert directly after this bogus one is:
ASSERT(ifp->if_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE);
Which covers the context in which it is legal to call
xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents just fine. Hence we should just remove the
bogus assert as it is clearly wrong and causes a regression.
The returns the test behaviour to the pre-existing assert failure in
xfs_dir2_shrink_inode() that indicates xfs_bunmapi() has failed to
remove all the extents in the range it was asked to unmap.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/xfs')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c index 7e3b9b01431e..3f8b6da09261 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c @@ -605,7 +605,6 @@ xfs_bmap_btree_to_extents( ASSERT(cur); ASSERT(whichfork != XFS_COW_FORK); - ASSERT(!xfs_need_iread_extents(ifp)); ASSERT(ifp->if_format == XFS_DINODE_FMT_BTREE); ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(rblock->bb_level) == 1); ASSERT(be16_to_cpu(rblock->bb_numrecs) == 1); |