summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/udf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>2015-11-05 18:43:46 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2015-11-05 19:34:48 -0800
commitd30e2c05a1a231452c273e74851d6b70d516f7f2 (patch)
tree54a5064389f61024aec000c0dec047fa90d1e594 /fs/udf
parent6933599697c96c3213c95f5f1fc7cb6abfd08c54 (diff)
downloadlinux-d30e2c05a1a231452c273e74851d6b70d516f7f2.tar.bz2
inotify: actually check for invalid bits in sys_inotify_add_watch()
The comment here says that it is checking for invalid bits. But, the mask is *actually* checking to ensure that _any_ valid bit is set, which is quite different. Without this check, an unexpected bit could get set on an inotify object. Since these bits are also interpreted by the fsnotify/dnotify code, there is the potential for an object to be mishandled inside the kernel. For instance, can we be sure that setting the dnotify flag FS_DN_RENAME on an inotify watch is harmless? Add the actual check which was intended. Retain the existing inotify bits are being added to the watch. Plus, this is existing behavior which would be nice to preserve. I did a quick sniff test that inotify functions and that my 'inotify-tools' package passes 'make check'. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: John McCutchan <john@johnmccutchan.com> Cc: Robert Love <rlove@rlove.org> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@fedoraproject.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/udf')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions