summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/sysfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-02-24 18:18:26 -0600
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2020-02-26 16:43:09 -0800
commitd1c73cbdf9d3f6181a50398568372ef41b1f485c (patch)
tree0b938757becd55e3914f653e6f69aa35e8bf3626 /fs/sysfs
parent274ac2831a8b1fd54de476979da6bd8f38d4cb5d (diff)
downloadlinux-d1c73cbdf9d3f6181a50398568372ef41b1f485c.tar.bz2
net: cisco: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] Lastly, fix the following checkpatch warning: CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'u_int32_t' #61: FILE: drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/vnic_devcmd.h:653: + u_int32_t val[]; This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/sysfs')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions