diff options
| author | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2017-01-18 02:53:44 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2017-04-18 11:42:36 -0700 |
| commit | 5f0d5a3ae7cff0d7fa943c199c3a2e44f23e1fac (patch) | |
| tree | b7ba2116923723e193dfe7c633ec10056c6b1b53 /fs/signalfd.c | |
| parent | 4495c08e84729385774601b5146d51d9e5849f81 (diff) | |
| download | linux-5f0d5a3ae7cff0d7fa943c199c3a2e44f23e1fac.tar.bz2 | |
mm: Rename SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU
A group of Linux kernel hackers reported chasing a bug that resulted
from their assumption that SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU provided an existence
guarantee, that is, that no block from such a slab would be reallocated
during an RCU read-side critical section. Of course, that is not the
case. Instead, SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU only prevents freeing of an entire
slab of blocks.
However, there is a phrase for this, namely "type safety". This commit
therefore renames SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU to SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU in order
to avoid future instances of this sort of confusion.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
[ paulmck: Add comments mentioning the old name, as requested by Eric
Dumazet, in order to help people familiar with the old name find
the new one. ]
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/signalfd.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/signalfd.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/signalfd.c b/fs/signalfd.c index 270221fcef42..7e3d71109f51 100644 --- a/fs/signalfd.c +++ b/fs/signalfd.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ void signalfd_cleanup(struct sighand_struct *sighand) /* * The lockless check can race with remove_wait_queue() in progress, * but in this case its caller should run under rcu_read_lock() and - * sighand_cachep is SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU, we can safely return. + * sighand_cachep is SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, we can safely return. */ if (likely(!waitqueue_active(wqh))) return; |