diff options
| author | Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> | 2012-06-01 17:18:08 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2012-06-01 10:37:36 -0400 |
| commit | 033369d1af1264abc23bea2e174aa47cdd212f6f (patch) | |
| tree | b00e709d1e9270b1708488da7a596a8dff72541d /fs/reiserfs/journal.c | |
| parent | 5c5fd81962271d4ee2984837fef4ec37e689aa41 (diff) | |
| download | linux-033369d1af1264abc23bea2e174aa47cdd212f6f.tar.bz2 | |
reiserfs: get rid of resierfs_sync_super
This patch stops reiserfs using the VFS 'write_super()' method along with the
s_dirt flag, because they are on their way out.
The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the
'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and
writes out all dirty superblock using the '->write_super()' call-back. But the
problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every
5 seconds, even if there are no diry superblocks, or there are no client
file-systems which would need this (e.g., btrfs does not use
'->write_super()'). So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make
file-systems to stop using the '->write_super()' VFS service, and then remove
it together with the kernel thread.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/reiserfs/journal.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/reiserfs/journal.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c index e5e06dd8562f..afcadcc03e8a 100644 --- a/fs/reiserfs/journal.c +++ b/fs/reiserfs/journal.c @@ -1923,6 +1923,8 @@ static int do_journal_release(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th, * the workqueue job (flush_async_commit) needs this lock */ reiserfs_write_unlock(sb); + + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&REISERFS_SB(sb)->old_work); flush_workqueue(commit_wq); if (!reiserfs_mounted_fs_count) { @@ -3314,7 +3316,7 @@ int journal_mark_dirty(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th, journal->j_first = cn; journal->j_last = cn; } - sb->s_dirt = 1; + reiserfs_schedule_old_flush(sb); return 0; } @@ -3952,7 +3954,7 @@ static int do_journal_end(struct reiserfs_transaction_handle *th, ** it tells us if we should continue with the journal_end, or just return */ if (!check_journal_end(th, sb, nblocks, flags)) { - sb->s_dirt = 1; + reiserfs_schedule_old_flush(sb); wake_queued_writers(sb); reiserfs_async_progress_wait(sb); goto out; |