summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/proc/stat.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>2012-10-10 11:51:09 +0530
committerThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>2012-10-10 14:05:21 +0200
commit7386cdbf2f57ea8cff3c9fde93f206e58b9fe13f (patch)
tree8ae7decceaeb1a453e167828bfaec1771a059cc3 /fs/proc/stat.c
parentf784e8a7989c0da3062d04bfea3db90f41e8f738 (diff)
downloadlinux-7386cdbf2f57ea8cff3c9fde93f206e58b9fe13f.tar.bz2
nohz: Fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat
Git commit 09a1d34f8535ecf9 "nohz: Make idle/iowait counter update conditional" introduced a bug in regard to cpu hotplug. The effect is that the number of idle ticks in the cpu summary line in /proc/stat is still counting ticks for offline cpus. Reproduction is easy, just start a workload that keeps all cpus busy, switch off one or more cpus and then watch the idle field in top. On a dual-core with one cpu 100% busy and one offline cpu you will get something like this: %Cpu(s): 48.7 us, 1.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 50.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, %0.0 st The problem is that an offline cpu still has ts->idle_active == 1. To fix this we should make sure that the cpu is online when calling get_cpu_idle_time_us and get_cpu_iowait_time_us. [Srivatsa: Rebased to current mainline] Reported-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20121010061820.8999.57245.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com Cc: deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/proc/stat.c')
-rw-r--r--fs/proc/stat.c14
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/proc/stat.c b/fs/proc/stat.c
index 64c3b3172367..e296572c73ed 100644
--- a/fs/proc/stat.c
+++ b/fs/proc/stat.c
@@ -45,10 +45,13 @@ static cputime64_t get_iowait_time(int cpu)
static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
{
- u64 idle, idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+ u64 idle, idle_time = -1ULL;
+
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
if (idle_time == -1ULL)
- /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
+ /* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
idle = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IDLE];
else
idle = usecs_to_cputime64(idle_time);
@@ -58,10 +61,13 @@ static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
static u64 get_iowait_time(int cpu)
{
- u64 iowait, iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
+ u64 iowait, iowait_time = -1ULL;
+
+ if (cpu_online(cpu))
+ iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
if (iowait_time == -1ULL)
- /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
+ /* !NO_HZ or cpu offline so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
iowait = kcpustat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[CPUTIME_IOWAIT];
else
iowait = usecs_to_cputime64(iowait_time);