diff options
author | Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> | 2019-07-12 15:24:34 +0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> | 2019-07-16 13:23:40 +0200 |
commit | 0be0bfd2de9dfdd2098a9c5b14bdd8f739c9165d (patch) | |
tree | 9fdb5305b90a0baffbdd019fed86e023da52e646 /fs/overlayfs/super.c | |
parent | 0ecfebd2b52404ae0c54a878c872bb93363ada36 (diff) | |
download | linux-0be0bfd2de9dfdd2098a9c5b14bdd8f739c9165d.tar.bz2 |
ovl: fix regression caused by overlapping layers detection
Once upon a time, commit 2cac0c00a6cd ("ovl: get exclusive ownership on
upper/work dirs") in v4.13 added some sanity checks on overlayfs layers.
This change caused a docker regression. The root cause was mount leaks
by docker, which as far as I know, still exist.
To mitigate the regression, commit 85fdee1eef1a ("ovl: fix regression
caused by exclusive upper/work dir protection") in v4.14 turned the
mount errors into warnings for the default index=off configuration.
Recently, commit 146d62e5a586 ("ovl: detect overlapping layers") in
v5.2, re-introduced exclusive upper/work dir checks regardless of
index=off configuration.
This changes the status quo and mount leak related bug reports have
started to re-surface. Restore the status quo to fix the regressions.
To clarify, index=off does NOT relax overlapping layers check for this
ovelayfs mount. index=off only relaxes exclusive upper/work dir checks
with another overlayfs mount.
To cover the part of overlapping layers detection that used the
exclusive upper/work dir checks to detect overlap with self upper/work
dir, add a trap also on the work base dir.
Link: https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/34672
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20171006121405.GA32700@veci.piliscsaba.szeredi.hu/
Link: https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/3540
Fixes: 146d62e5a586 ("ovl: detect overlapping layers")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/overlayfs/super.c')
-rw-r--r-- | fs/overlayfs/super.c | 73 |
1 files changed, 47 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/super.c b/fs/overlayfs/super.c index b368e2e102fa..afbcb116a7f1 100644 --- a/fs/overlayfs/super.c +++ b/fs/overlayfs/super.c @@ -212,6 +212,7 @@ static void ovl_free_fs(struct ovl_fs *ofs) { unsigned i; + iput(ofs->workbasedir_trap); iput(ofs->indexdir_trap); iput(ofs->workdir_trap); iput(ofs->upperdir_trap); @@ -1003,6 +1004,25 @@ static int ovl_setup_trap(struct super_block *sb, struct dentry *dir, return 0; } +/* + * Determine how we treat concurrent use of upperdir/workdir based on the + * index feature. This is papering over mount leaks of container runtimes, + * for example, an old overlay mount is leaked and now its upperdir is + * attempted to be used as a lower layer in a new overlay mount. + */ +static int ovl_report_in_use(struct ovl_fs *ofs, const char *name) +{ + if (ofs->config.index) { + pr_err("overlayfs: %s is in-use as upperdir/workdir of another mount, mount with '-o index=off' to override exclusive upperdir protection.\n", + name); + return -EBUSY; + } else { + pr_warn("overlayfs: %s is in-use as upperdir/workdir of another mount, accessing files from both mounts will result in undefined behavior.\n", + name); + return 0; + } +} + static int ovl_get_upper(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct path *upperpath) { @@ -1040,14 +1060,12 @@ static int ovl_get_upper(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs, upper_mnt->mnt_flags &= ~(MNT_NOATIME | MNT_NODIRATIME | MNT_RELATIME); ofs->upper_mnt = upper_mnt; - err = -EBUSY; if (ovl_inuse_trylock(ofs->upper_mnt->mnt_root)) { ofs->upperdir_locked = true; - } else if (ofs->config.index) { - pr_err("overlayfs: upperdir is in-use by another mount, mount with '-o index=off' to override exclusive upperdir protection.\n"); - goto out; } else { - pr_warn("overlayfs: upperdir is in-use by another mount, accessing files from both mounts will result in undefined behavior.\n"); + err = ovl_report_in_use(ofs, "upperdir"); + if (err) + goto out; } err = 0; @@ -1157,16 +1175,19 @@ static int ovl_get_workdir(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs, ofs->workbasedir = dget(workpath.dentry); - err = -EBUSY; if (ovl_inuse_trylock(ofs->workbasedir)) { ofs->workdir_locked = true; - } else if (ofs->config.index) { - pr_err("overlayfs: workdir is in-use by another mount, mount with '-o index=off' to override exclusive workdir protection.\n"); - goto out; } else { - pr_warn("overlayfs: workdir is in-use by another mount, accessing files from both mounts will result in undefined behavior.\n"); + err = ovl_report_in_use(ofs, "workdir"); + if (err) + goto out; } + err = ovl_setup_trap(sb, ofs->workbasedir, &ofs->workbasedir_trap, + "workdir"); + if (err) + goto out; + err = ovl_make_workdir(sb, ofs, &workpath); out: @@ -1313,16 +1334,16 @@ static int ovl_get_lower_layers(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs, if (err < 0) goto out; - err = -EBUSY; - if (ovl_is_inuse(stack[i].dentry)) { - pr_err("overlayfs: lowerdir is in-use as upperdir/workdir\n"); - goto out; - } - err = ovl_setup_trap(sb, stack[i].dentry, &trap, "lowerdir"); if (err) goto out; + if (ovl_is_inuse(stack[i].dentry)) { + err = ovl_report_in_use(ofs, "lowerdir"); + if (err) + goto out; + } + mnt = clone_private_mount(&stack[i]); err = PTR_ERR(mnt); if (IS_ERR(mnt)) { @@ -1469,8 +1490,8 @@ out_err: * - another layer of this overlayfs instance * - upper/work dir of any overlayfs instance */ -static int ovl_check_layer(struct super_block *sb, struct dentry *dentry, - const char *name) +static int ovl_check_layer(struct super_block *sb, struct ovl_fs *ofs, + struct dentry *dentry, const char *name) { struct dentry *next = dentry, *parent; int err = 0; @@ -1482,13 +1503,11 @@ static int ovl_check_layer(struct super_block *sb, struct dentry *dentry, /* Walk back ancestors to root (inclusive) looking for traps */ while (!err && parent != next) { - if (ovl_is_inuse(parent)) { - err = -EBUSY; - pr_err("overlayfs: %s path overlapping in-use upperdir/workdir\n", - name); - } else if (ovl_lookup_trap_inode(sb, parent)) { + if (ovl_lookup_trap_inode(sb, parent)) { err = -ELOOP; pr_err("overlayfs: overlapping %s path\n", name); + } else if (ovl_is_inuse(parent)) { + err = ovl_report_in_use(ofs, name); } next = parent; parent = dget_parent(next); @@ -1509,7 +1528,8 @@ static int ovl_check_overlapping_layers(struct super_block *sb, int i, err; if (ofs->upper_mnt) { - err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs->upper_mnt->mnt_root, "upperdir"); + err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs, ofs->upper_mnt->mnt_root, + "upperdir"); if (err) return err; @@ -1520,13 +1540,14 @@ static int ovl_check_overlapping_layers(struct super_block *sb, * workbasedir. In that case, we already have their traps in * inode cache and we will catch that case on lookup. */ - err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs->workbasedir, "workdir"); + err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs, ofs->workbasedir, "workdir"); if (err) return err; } for (i = 0; i < ofs->numlower; i++) { - err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs->lower_layers[i].mnt->mnt_root, + err = ovl_check_layer(sb, ofs, + ofs->lower_layers[i].mnt->mnt_root, "lowerdir"); if (err) return err; |