diff options
| author | Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> | 2015-03-04 12:37:22 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> | 2015-08-17 18:39:46 -0400 |
| commit | 74278da9f70d84d715601fe794567a6d2bfdf078 (patch) | |
| tree | 49262a88fc42b85bfe4930f5cd7a832d5ba647c6 /fs/notify | |
| parent | cbedaac63481dea52327127a9f1c60f092bd6b07 (diff) | |
| download | linux-74278da9f70d84d715601fe794567a6d2bfdf078.tar.bz2 | |
inode: convert inode_sb_list_lock to per-sb
The process of reducing contention on per-superblock inode lists
starts with moving the locking to match the per-superblock inode
list. This takes the global lock out of the picture and reduces the
contention problems to within a single filesystem. This doesn't get
rid of contention as the locks still have global CPU scope, but it
does isolate operations on different superblocks form each other.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/notify')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/notify/inode_mark.c | 20 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c index 3daf513ee99e..a4e1a8f6c329 100644 --- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c +++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c @@ -163,17 +163,17 @@ int fsnotify_add_inode_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark, /** * fsnotify_unmount_inodes - an sb is unmounting. handle any watched inodes. - * @list: list of inodes being unmounted (sb->s_inodes) + * @sb: superblock being unmounted. * * Called during unmount with no locks held, so needs to be safe against - * concurrent modifiers. We temporarily drop inode_sb_list_lock and CAN block. + * concurrent modifiers. We temporarily drop sb->s_inode_list_lock and CAN block. */ -void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct list_head *list) +void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct super_block *sb) { struct inode *inode, *next_i, *need_iput = NULL; - spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock); - list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next_i, list, i_sb_list) { + spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock); + list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next_i, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) { struct inode *need_iput_tmp; /* @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct list_head *list) spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); /* In case the dropping of a reference would nuke next_i. */ - while (&next_i->i_sb_list != list) { + while (&next_i->i_sb_list != &sb->s_inodes) { spin_lock(&next_i->i_lock); if (!(next_i->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) && atomic_read(&next_i->i_count)) { @@ -224,12 +224,12 @@ void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct list_head *list) } /* - * We can safely drop inode_sb_list_lock here because either + * We can safely drop s_inode_list_lock here because either * we actually hold references on both inode and next_i or * end of list. Also no new inodes will be added since the * umount has begun. */ - spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock); + spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock); if (need_iput_tmp) iput(need_iput_tmp); @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct list_head *list) iput(inode); - spin_lock(&inode_sb_list_lock); + spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock); } - spin_unlock(&inode_sb_list_lock); + spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock); } |