summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/notify
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>2014-08-06 16:03:28 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2014-08-06 18:01:12 -0700
commit5838d4442bd5971687b72221736222637e03140d (patch)
treee639967a7baf1b1c6a0d1b5e0babc8083c7faad4 /fs/notify
parent8ba8fa917093510cdcb4ec8ff8b9603e1b525658 (diff)
downloadlinux-5838d4442bd5971687b72221736222637e03140d.tar.bz2
fanotify: fix double free of pending permission events
Commit 85816794240b ("fanotify: Fix use after free for permission events") introduced a double free issue for permission events which are pending in group's notification queue while group is being destroyed. These events are freed from fanotify_handle_event() but they are not removed from groups notification queue and thus they get freed again from fsnotify_flush_notify(). Fix the problem by removing permission events from notification queue before freeing them if we skip processing access response. Also expand comments in fanotify_release() to explain group shutdown in detail. Fixes: 85816794240b9659e66e4d9b0df7c6e814e5f603 Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: Douglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com> Tested-by: Douglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com> Reported-by: Heinrich Schuchard <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/notify')
-rw-r--r--fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c9
-rw-r--r--fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c12
-rw-r--r--fs/notify/notification.c18
3 files changed, 37 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
index fdeb36b70c65..30d3addfad75 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c
@@ -70,8 +70,15 @@ static int fanotify_get_response(struct fsnotify_group *group,
wait_event(group->fanotify_data.access_waitq, event->response ||
atomic_read(&group->fanotify_data.bypass_perm));
- if (!event->response) /* bypass_perm set */
+ if (!event->response) { /* bypass_perm set */
+ /*
+ * Event was canceled because group is being destroyed. Remove
+ * it from group's event list because we are responsible for
+ * freeing the permission event.
+ */
+ fsnotify_remove_event(group, &event->fae.fse);
return 0;
+ }
/* userspace responded, convert to something usable */
switch (event->response) {
diff --git a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
index fbf2210823ab..b13992a41bd9 100644
--- a/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c
@@ -359,6 +359,11 @@ static int fanotify_release(struct inode *ignored, struct file *file)
#ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY_ACCESS_PERMISSIONS
struct fanotify_perm_event_info *event, *next;
+ /*
+ * There may be still new events arriving in the notification queue
+ * but since userspace cannot use fanotify fd anymore, no event can
+ * enter or leave access_list by now.
+ */
spin_lock(&group->fanotify_data.access_lock);
atomic_inc(&group->fanotify_data.bypass_perm);
@@ -373,6 +378,13 @@ static int fanotify_release(struct inode *ignored, struct file *file)
}
spin_unlock(&group->fanotify_data.access_lock);
+ /*
+ * Since bypass_perm is set, newly queued events will not wait for
+ * access response. Wake up the already sleeping ones now.
+ * synchronize_srcu() in fsnotify_destroy_group() will wait for all
+ * processes sleeping in fanotify_handle_event() waiting for access
+ * response and thus also for all permission events to be freed.
+ */
wake_up(&group->fanotify_data.access_waitq);
#endif
diff --git a/fs/notify/notification.c b/fs/notify/notification.c
index 1d394220acbe..a95d8e037aeb 100644
--- a/fs/notify/notification.c
+++ b/fs/notify/notification.c
@@ -73,7 +73,8 @@ void fsnotify_destroy_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
/* Overflow events are per-group and we don't want to free them */
if (!event || event->mask == FS_Q_OVERFLOW)
return;
-
+ /* If the event is still queued, we have a problem... */
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&event->list));
group->ops->free_event(event);
}
@@ -125,6 +126,21 @@ queue:
}
/*
+ * Remove @event from group's notification queue. It is the responsibility of
+ * the caller to destroy the event.
+ */
+void fsnotify_remove_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
+ struct fsnotify_event *event)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&group->notification_mutex);
+ if (!list_empty(&event->list)) {
+ list_del_init(&event->list);
+ group->q_len--;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&group->notification_mutex);
+}
+
+/*
* Remove and return the first event from the notification list. It is the
* responsibility of the caller to destroy the obtained event
*/