nilfs2: use semaphore to protect pointer to a writable FS-instance

will get rid of nilfs_get_writer() and nilfs_put_writer() pair used to
retain a writable FS-instance for a period.

The pair functions were making up some kind of recursive lock with a
mutex, but they became overkill since the commit
201913ed746c7724a40d33ee5a0b6a1fd2ef3193.  Furthermore, they caused
the following lockdep warning because the mutex can be released by a
task which didn't lock it:

 =====================================
 [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
 -------------------------------------
 kswapd0/422 is trying to release lock (&nilfs->ns_writer_mutex) at:
 [<c1359ff5>] mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
 but there are no more locks to release!

 other info that might help us debug this:
 no locks held by kswapd0/422.

 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 422, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.31-rc4-nilfs #51
 Call Trace:
  [<c1358f97>] ? printk+0xf/0x18
  [<c104fea7>] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xcc/0xd7
  [<c11578de>] ? prop_put_global+0x3/0x35
  [<c1050195>] lock_release+0xed/0x1dc
  [<c1359ff5>] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
  [<c1359f83>] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xaf/0x119
  [<c1359ff5>] mutex_unlock+0x8/0xa
  [<d1284add>] nilfs_mdt_write_page+0xd8/0xe1 [nilfs2]
  [<c1092653>] shrink_page_list+0x379/0x68d
  [<c109171b>] ? isolate_pages_global+0xb4/0x18c
  [<c1092bd2>] shrink_list+0x26b/0x54b
  [<c10930be>] shrink_zone+0x20c/0x2a2
  [<c10936b7>] kswapd+0x407/0x591
  [<c1091667>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x18c
  [<c1040603>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x33
  [<c10932b0>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x591
  [<c104033b>] kthread+0x69/0x6e
  [<c10402d2>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6e
  [<c1003e33>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x1a

This patch uses a reader/writer semaphore instead of the own lock and
kills this warning.

Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
index 8b8889825716..0c4573653b87 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/the_nilfs.c
@@ -68,12 +68,11 @@ static struct the_nilfs *alloc_nilfs(struct block_device *bdev)
 
 	nilfs->ns_bdev = bdev;
 	atomic_set(&nilfs->ns_count, 1);
-	atomic_set(&nilfs->ns_writer_refcount, -1);
 	atomic_set(&nilfs->ns_ndirtyblks, 0);
 	init_rwsem(&nilfs->ns_sem);
 	init_rwsem(&nilfs->ns_super_sem);
 	mutex_init(&nilfs->ns_mount_mutex);
-	mutex_init(&nilfs->ns_writer_mutex);
+	init_rwsem(&nilfs->ns_writer_sem);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nilfs->ns_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nilfs->ns_supers);
 	spin_lock_init(&nilfs->ns_last_segment_lock);