summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/nfsd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYu Zhiguo <yuzg@cn.fujitsu.com>2009-05-19 14:09:54 +0800
committerJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>2009-06-01 18:09:20 -0400
commit0a93a47f042c459f0f46942c3a920e3c81878031 (patch)
tree9204c71810c955114ce4e6f73bdbf70d6b0dcc59 /fs/nfsd
parent3c8e03166ae234d16e7871f8009638e0946d303c (diff)
downloadlinux-0a93a47f042c459f0f46942c3a920e3c81878031.tar.bz2
NFSv4: kill off complicated macro 'PROC'
J. Bruce Fields wrote: ... > (This is extremely confusing code to track down: note that > proc->pc_decode is set to nfs4svc_decode_compoundargs() by the PROC() > macro at the end of fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c. Which means, for example, that > grepping for nfs4svc_decode_compoundargs() gets you nowhere. Patches to > kill off that macro would be welcomed....) the macro 'PROC' is complicated and obscure, it had better be killed off in order to make the code more clear. Signed-off-by: Yu Zhiguo <yuzg@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/nfsd')
-rw-r--r--fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c34
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index 9272e1f806fc..7c8801769a3c 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -1313,24 +1313,9 @@ static const char *nfsd4_op_name(unsigned opnum)
return "unknown_operation";
}
-#define nfs4svc_decode_voidargs NULL
-#define nfs4svc_release_void NULL
#define nfsd4_voidres nfsd4_voidargs
-#define nfs4svc_release_compound NULL
struct nfsd4_voidargs { int dummy; };
-#define PROC(name, argt, rest, relt, cache, respsize) \
- { (svc_procfunc) nfsd4_proc_##name, \
- (kxdrproc_t) nfs4svc_decode_##argt##args, \
- (kxdrproc_t) nfs4svc_encode_##rest##res, \
- (kxdrproc_t) nfs4svc_release_##relt, \
- sizeof(struct nfsd4_##argt##args), \
- sizeof(struct nfsd4_##rest##res), \
- 0, \
- cache, \
- respsize, \
- }
-
/*
* TODO: At the present time, the NFSv4 server does not do XID caching
* of requests. Implementing XID caching would not be a serious problem,
@@ -1342,8 +1327,23 @@ struct nfsd4_voidargs { int dummy; };
* better XID's.
*/
static struct svc_procedure nfsd_procedures4[2] = {
- PROC(null, void, void, void, RC_NOCACHE, 1),
- PROC(compound, compound, compound, compound, RC_NOCACHE, NFSD_BUFSIZE/4)
+ [NFSPROC4_NULL] = {
+ .pc_func = (svc_procfunc) nfsd4_proc_null,
+ .pc_encode = (kxdrproc_t) nfs4svc_encode_voidres,
+ .pc_argsize = sizeof(struct nfsd4_voidargs),
+ .pc_ressize = sizeof(struct nfsd4_voidres),
+ .pc_cachetype = RC_NOCACHE,
+ .pc_xdrressize = 1,
+ },
+ [NFSPROC4_COMPOUND] = {
+ .pc_func = (svc_procfunc) nfsd4_proc_compound,
+ .pc_decode = (kxdrproc_t) nfs4svc_decode_compoundargs,
+ .pc_encode = (kxdrproc_t) nfs4svc_encode_compoundres,
+ .pc_argsize = sizeof(struct nfsd4_compoundargs),
+ .pc_ressize = sizeof(struct nfsd4_compoundres),
+ .pc_cachetype = RC_NOCACHE,
+ .pc_xdrressize = NFSD_BUFSIZE/4,
+ },
};
struct svc_version nfsd_version4 = {