btrfs: fix lockdep warning due to seqcount_mutex on 32bit arch

This effectively reverts commit d5c8238849e7 ("btrfs: convert
data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t").

While running fstests on 32 bits test box, many tests failed because of
warnings in dmesg. One of those warnings (btrfs/003):

  [66.441317] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 9251 at include/linux/seqlock.h:279 btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0 [btrfs]
  [66.441446] CPU: 6 PID: 9251 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G           O      5.11.0-rc4-custom+ #5
  [66.441449] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ArchLinux 1.14.0-1 04/01/2014
  [66.441451] EIP: btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0 [btrfs]
  [66.441472] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000001 ECX: c576070c EDX: c6b15803
  [66.441475] ESI: 10000000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: c56fbcfc ESP: c56fbc70
  [66.441477] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [66.441481] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 05c8da20 CR3: 04b20000 CR4: 00350ed0
  [66.441485] Call Trace:
  [66.441510]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xb1/0x100 [btrfs]
  [66.441529]  ? btrfs_lookup_block_group+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
  [66.441562]  btrfs_balance+0x8ed/0x13b0 [btrfs]
  [66.441586]  ? btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x333/0x3c0 [btrfs]
  [66.441619]  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x11
  [66.441643]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x333/0x3c0 [btrfs]
  [66.441664]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
  [66.441683]  btrfs_ioctl+0x414/0x2ae0 [btrfs]
  [66.441700]  ? __lock_acquire+0x35f/0x2650
  [66.441717]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x87/0x120
  [66.441720]  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xd0/0x1e0
  [66.441724]  ? call_rcu+0x2d3/0x530
  [66.441731]  ? __might_fault+0x41/0x90
  [66.441736]  ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x15/0x50
  [66.441740]  ? sched_clock+0x8/0x10
  [66.441745]  ? sched_clock_cpu+0x13/0x180
  [66.441750]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
  [66.441750]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x30/0x30 [btrfs]
  [66.441768]  __ia32_sys_ioctl+0x165/0x8a0
  [66.441773]  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x11
  [66.441785]  ? __might_fault+0x89/0x90
  [66.441791]  __do_fast_syscall_32+0x54/0x80
  [66.441796]  do_fast_syscall_32+0x32/0x70
  [66.441801]  do_SYSENTER_32+0x15/0x20
  [66.441805]  entry_SYSENTER_32+0x9f/0xf2
  [66.441808] EIP: 0xab7b5549
  [66.441814] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 00000003 ECX: c4009420 EDX: bfa91f5c
  [66.441816] ESI: 00000003 EDI: 00000001 EBP: 00000000 ESP: bfa91e98
  [66.441818] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b EFLAGS: 00000292
  [66.441833] irq event stamp: 42579
  [66.441835] hardirqs last  enabled at (42585): [<c60eb065>] console_unlock+0x495/0x590
  [66.441838] hardirqs last disabled at (42590): [<c60eafd5>] console_unlock+0x405/0x590
  [66.441840] softirqs last  enabled at (41698): [<c601b76c>] call_on_stack+0x1c/0x60
  [66.441843] softirqs last disabled at (41681): [<c601b76c>] call_on_stack+0x1c/0x60

  ========================================================================
  btrfs_remove_chunk+0x58b/0x7b0:
  __seqprop_mutex_assert at linux/./include/linux/seqlock.h:279
  (inlined by) btrfs_device_set_bytes_used at linux/fs/btrfs/volumes.h:212
  (inlined by) btrfs_remove_chunk at linux/fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2994
  ========================================================================

The warning is produced by lockdep_assert_held() in
__seqprop_mutex_assert() if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is enabled.
And "olumes.c:2994 is btrfs_device_set_bytes_used() with mutex lock
fs_info->chunk_mutex held already.

After adding some debug prints, the cause was found that many
__alloc_device() are called with NULL @fs_info (during scanning ioctl).
Inside the function, btrfs_device_data_ordered_init() is expanded to
seqcount_mutex_init().  In this scenario, its second
parameter info->chunk_mutex  is &NULL->chunk_mutex which equals
to offsetof(struct btrfs_fs_info, chunk_mutex) unexpectedly. Thus,
seqcount_mutex_init() is called in wrong way. And later
btrfs_device_get/set helpers trigger lockdep warnings.

The device and filesystem object lifetimes are different and we'd have
to synchronize initialization of the btrfs_device::data_seqcount with
the fs_info, possibly using some additional synchronization. It would
still not prevent concurrent access to the seqcount lock when it's used
for read and initialization.

Commit d5c8238849e7 ("btrfs: convert data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t")
does not mention a particular problem being fixed so revert should not
cause any harm and we'll get the lockdep warning fixed.

Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210139
Reported-by: Erhard F <erhard_f@mailbox.org>
Fixes: d5c8238849e7 ("btrfs: convert data_seqcount to seqcount_mutex_t")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10
CC: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 0c7f4f6237e8..b900cc7849b6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static struct btrfs_device *__alloc_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 
 	atomic_set(&dev->reada_in_flight, 0);
 	atomic_set(&dev->dev_stats_ccnt, 0);
-	btrfs_device_data_ordered_init(dev, fs_info);
+	btrfs_device_data_ordered_init(dev);
 	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&dev->reada_zones, GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM);
 	INIT_RADIX_TREE(&dev->reada_extents, GFP_NOFS & ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM);
 	extent_io_tree_init(fs_info, &dev->alloc_state,