Merge tag '9p-for-5.1' of git://github.com/martinetd/linux

Pull 9p updates from Dominique Martinet:
 "Here is a 9p update for 5.1; there honestly hasn't been much.

  Two fixes (leak on invalid mount argument and possible deadlock on
  i_size update on 32bit smp) and a fall-through warning cleanup"

* tag '9p-for-5.1' of git://github.com/martinetd/linux:
  9p/net: fix memory leak in p9_client_create
  9p: use inode->i_lock to protect i_size_write() under 32-bit
  9p: mark expected switch fall-through

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/fs/9p/v9fs_vfs.h b/fs/9p/v9fs_vfs.h
index 5a0db6dec8d1..aaee1e6584e6 100644
--- a/fs/9p/v9fs_vfs.h
+++ b/fs/9p/v9fs_vfs.h
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
  */
 #define P9_LOCK_TIMEOUT (30*HZ)
 
+/* flags for v9fs_stat2inode() & v9fs_stat2inode_dotl() */
+#define V9FS_STAT2INODE_KEEP_ISIZE 1
+
 extern struct file_system_type v9fs_fs_type;
 extern const struct address_space_operations v9fs_addr_operations;
 extern const struct file_operations v9fs_file_operations;
@@ -61,8 +64,10 @@ int v9fs_init_inode(struct v9fs_session_info *v9ses,
 		    struct inode *inode, umode_t mode, dev_t);
 void v9fs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode);
 ino_t v9fs_qid2ino(struct p9_qid *qid);
-void v9fs_stat2inode(struct p9_wstat *, struct inode *, struct super_block *);
-void v9fs_stat2inode_dotl(struct p9_stat_dotl *, struct inode *);
+void v9fs_stat2inode(struct p9_wstat *stat, struct inode *inode,
+		      struct super_block *sb, unsigned int flags);
+void v9fs_stat2inode_dotl(struct p9_stat_dotl *stat, struct inode *inode,
+			   unsigned int flags);
 int v9fs_dir_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp);
 int v9fs_file_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file);
 void v9fs_inode2stat(struct inode *inode, struct p9_wstat *stat);
@@ -83,4 +88,18 @@ static inline void v9fs_invalidate_inode_attr(struct inode *inode)
 }
 
 int v9fs_open_to_dotl_flags(int flags);
+
+static inline void v9fs_i_size_write(struct inode *inode, loff_t i_size)
+{
+	/*
+	 * 32-bit need the lock, concurrent updates could break the
+	 * sequences and make i_size_read() loop forever.
+	 * 64-bit updates are atomic and can skip the locking.
+	 */
+	if (sizeof(i_size) > sizeof(long))
+		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+	i_size_write(inode, i_size);
+	if (sizeof(i_size) > sizeof(long))
+		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+}
 #endif