summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/phy
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>2016-06-27 10:39:27 -0700
committerUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>2016-07-25 10:38:00 +0200
commit95cc46fee6e177668087f18549c07daec30c16c8 (patch)
treed68f2909f88b5514b228f7382d02fc48b95f2080 /drivers/phy
parent4e2ea670861f2068082da310f25815c7498a41dc (diff)
downloadlinux-95cc46fee6e177668087f18549c07daec30c16c8.tar.bz2
phy: rockchip-emmc: Wait even longer for the DLL to lock
Two times out of 2000 reboots I ran into the error message "rockchip_emmc_phy_power: dllrdy timeout". Presumably there is some corner case where the DLL just takes a little longer to timeout. Let's give it even more time to handle these corner cases. Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/phy')
-rw-r--r--drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c12
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
index a2aa6aca7dec..fd57345ffed2 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
@@ -206,8 +206,18 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power(struct phy *phy, bool on_off)
* per the math: 10.2 us * (50000000 Hz / 100000 Hz) => 5.1 ms
* Hopefully we won't be running at 100 kHz, but we should still make
* sure we wait long enough.
+ *
+ * NOTE: There appear to be corner cases where the DLL seems to take
+ * extra long to lock for reasons that aren't understood. In some
+ * extreme cases we've seen it take up to over 10ms (!). We'll be
+ * generous and give it 50ms. We still busy wait here because:
+ * - In most cases it should be super fast.
+ * - This is not called lots during normal operation so it shouldn't
+ * be a power or performance problem to busy wait. We expect it
+ * only at boot / resume. In both cases, eMMC is probably on the
+ * critical path so busy waiting a little extra time should be OK.
*/
- timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
+ timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(50);
do {
udelay(1);