summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/dsa
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEgil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no>2017-10-24 17:14:10 +0200
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2017-10-26 17:40:32 +0900
commit3c91b0c1de8d013490bbc41ce9ee8810ea5baddd (patch)
tree837720e8983191cdd9b9804988a3d26061c72cbb /drivers/net/dsa
parentacfdf7eabea4186a386ba5e656f0c739563cb1a5 (diff)
downloadlinux-3c91b0c1de8d013490bbc41ce9ee8810ea5baddd.tar.bz2
net: dsa: lan9303: Do not disable switch fabric port 0 at .probe
Make the LAN9303 work when lan9303_probe() is called twice. For some unknown reason the LAN9303 switch fail to forward data when switch fabric port 0 TX is disabled during probe. (Write of LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0 in lan9303_disable_processing_port().) In that situation the switch fabric seem to receive frames, because the ALR is learning addresses. But no frames are transmitted on any of the ports. In our system lan9303_probe() is called twice, first time dsa_register_switch() return -EPROBE_DEFER. As an experiment, modified the code to skip writing LAN9303_MAC_TX_CFG_0, port 0 during the first probe. Then the switch works as expected. Resolve the problem by not calling lan9303_disable_processing_port() on port 0 during probe. Ports 1 and 2 are still disabled. Although unsatisfying that the exact failure mechanism is not known, the patch should not cause any harm. Signed-off-by: Egil Hjelmeland <privat@egil-hjelmeland.no> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/dsa')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
index 87f919f0e641..4c412bd52319 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
@@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static int lan9303_disable_processing(struct lan9303 *chip)
{
int p;
- for (p = 0; p < LAN9303_NUM_PORTS; p++) {
+ for (p = 1; p < LAN9303_NUM_PORTS; p++) {
int ret = lan9303_disable_processing_port(chip, p);
if (ret)