mfd: core: Push irqdomain mapping out into devices

Currently the MFD core supports remapping MFD cell interrupts using an
irqdomain but only if the MFD is being instantiated using device tree
and only if the device tree bindings use the pattern of registering IPs
in the device tree with compatible properties.  This will be actively
harmful for drivers which support non-DT platforms and use this pattern
for their DT bindings as it will mean that the core will silently change
remapping behaviour and it is also limiting for drivers which don't do
DT with this particular pattern.  There is also a potential fragility if
there are interrupts not associated with MFD cells and all the cells are
omitted from the device tree for some reason.

Instead change the code to take an IRQ domain as an optional argument,
allowing drivers to take the decision about the parent domain for their
interrupts.  The one current user of this feature is ab8500-core, it has
the domain lookup pushed out into the driver.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
index 0c3a01cde2f7..f8b77711ad2d 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c
@@ -74,12 +74,11 @@ static int mfd_platform_add_cell(struct platform_device *pdev,
 static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
 			  const struct mfd_cell *cell,
 			  struct resource *mem_base,
-			  int irq_base)
+			  int irq_base, struct irq_domain *domain)
 {
 	struct resource *res;
 	struct platform_device *pdev;
 	struct device_node *np = NULL;
-	struct irq_domain *domain = NULL;
 	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 	int r;
 
@@ -97,7 +96,6 @@ static int mfd_add_device(struct device *parent, int id,
 		for_each_child_of_node(parent->of_node, np) {
 			if (of_device_is_compatible(np, cell->of_compatible)) {
 				pdev->dev.of_node = np;
-				domain = irq_find_host(parent->of_node);
 				break;
 			}
 		}
@@ -177,7 +175,7 @@ fail_alloc:
 int mfd_add_devices(struct device *parent, int id,
 		    struct mfd_cell *cells, int n_devs,
 		    struct resource *mem_base,
-		    int irq_base)
+		    int irq_base, struct irq_domain *domain)
 {
 	int i;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -191,7 +189,8 @@ int mfd_add_devices(struct device *parent, int id,
 	for (i = 0; i < n_devs; i++) {
 		atomic_set(&cnts[i], 0);
 		cells[i].usage_count = &cnts[i];
-		ret = mfd_add_device(parent, id, cells + i, mem_base, irq_base);
+		ret = mfd_add_device(parent, id, cells + i, mem_base,
+				     irq_base, domain);
 		if (ret)
 			break;
 	}
@@ -247,7 +246,8 @@ int mfd_clone_cell(const char *cell, const char **clones, size_t n_clones)
 	for (i = 0; i < n_clones; i++) {
 		cell_entry.name = clones[i];
 		/* don't give up if a single call fails; just report error */
-		if (mfd_add_device(pdev->dev.parent, -1, &cell_entry, NULL, 0))
+		if (mfd_add_device(pdev->dev.parent, -1, &cell_entry, NULL, 0,
+				   NULL))
 			dev_err(dev, "failed to create platform device '%s'\n",
 					clones[i]);
 	}