summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/i2c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRoland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>2012-08-08 09:42:32 +0200
committerWolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>2012-09-12 17:52:44 +0200
commitc076ada4e4aaf45e1a31ad6de7c6cce36081e045 (patch)
tree0c1676608ef8316d271ed0a54f275c21feb3008e /drivers/i2c
parentb3aafe80c83097403d2b5edccfc440fac3d5f028 (diff)
downloadlinux-c076ada4e4aaf45e1a31ad6de7c6cce36081e045.tar.bz2
i2c: pnx: Fix read transactions of >= 2 bytes
On transactions with n>=2 bytes, the controller actually wrongly clocks in n+1 bytes. This is caused by the (wrong) assumption that RFE in the Status Register is 1 iff there is no byte already ordered (via a dummy TX byte). This lead to the implementation of synchronized byte ordering, e.g.: Dummy-TX - RX - Dummy-TX - RX - ... But since RFE actually stays high after some Dummy-TX, it rather looks like: Dummy-TX - Dummy-TX - RX - Dummy-TX - RX - (RX) The last RX byte is clocked in by the bus controller, but ignored by the kernel when filling the userspace buffer. This patch fixes the issue by asking for RX via Dummy-TX asynchronously. Introducing a separate counter for TX bytes. Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/i2c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c48
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c
index b36e21f9fd53..8488bddfe465 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pnx.c
@@ -291,31 +291,37 @@ static int i2c_pnx_master_rcv(struct i2c_pnx_algo_data *alg_data)
* or we didn't 'ask' for it yet.
*/
if (ioread32(I2C_REG_STS(alg_data)) & mstatus_rfe) {
- dev_dbg(&alg_data->adapter.dev,
- "%s(): Write dummy data to fill Rx-fifo...\n",
- __func__);
+ /* 'Asking' is done asynchronously, e.g. dummy TX of several
+ * bytes is done before the first actual RX arrives in FIFO.
+ * Therefore, ordered bytes (via TX) are counted separately.
+ */
+ if (alg_data->mif.order) {
+ dev_dbg(&alg_data->adapter.dev,
+ "%s(): Write dummy data to fill Rx-fifo...\n",
+ __func__);
- if (alg_data->mif.len == 1) {
- /* Last byte, do not acknowledge next rcv. */
- val |= stop_bit;
+ if (alg_data->mif.order == 1) {
+ /* Last byte, do not acknowledge next rcv. */
+ val |= stop_bit;
+
+ /*
+ * Enable interrupt RFDAIE (data in Rx fifo),
+ * and disable DRMIE (need data for Tx)
+ */
+ ctl = ioread32(I2C_REG_CTL(alg_data));
+ ctl |= mcntrl_rffie | mcntrl_daie;
+ ctl &= ~mcntrl_drmie;
+ iowrite32(ctl, I2C_REG_CTL(alg_data));
+ }
/*
- * Enable interrupt RFDAIE (data in Rx fifo),
- * and disable DRMIE (need data for Tx)
+ * Now we'll 'ask' for data:
+ * For each byte we want to receive, we must
+ * write a (dummy) byte to the Tx-FIFO.
*/
- ctl = ioread32(I2C_REG_CTL(alg_data));
- ctl |= mcntrl_rffie | mcntrl_daie;
- ctl &= ~mcntrl_drmie;
- iowrite32(ctl, I2C_REG_CTL(alg_data));
+ iowrite32(val, I2C_REG_TX(alg_data));
+ alg_data->mif.order--;
}
-
- /*
- * Now we'll 'ask' for data:
- * For each byte we want to receive, we must
- * write a (dummy) byte to the Tx-FIFO.
- */
- iowrite32(val, I2C_REG_TX(alg_data));
-
return 0;
}
@@ -515,6 +521,7 @@ i2c_pnx_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
alg_data->mif.buf = pmsg->buf;
alg_data->mif.len = pmsg->len;
+ alg_data->mif.order = pmsg->len;
alg_data->mif.mode = (pmsg->flags & I2C_M_RD) ?
I2C_SMBUS_READ : I2C_SMBUS_WRITE;
alg_data->mif.ret = 0;
@@ -567,6 +574,7 @@ i2c_pnx_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
/* Cleanup to be sure... */
alg_data->mif.buf = NULL;
alg_data->mif.len = 0;
+ alg_data->mif.order = 0;
dev_dbg(&alg_data->adapter.dev, "%s(): exiting, stat = %x\n",
__func__, ioread32(I2C_REG_STS(alg_data)));