diff options
author | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2012-12-02 13:48:21 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> | 2013-01-20 22:16:55 +0100 |
commit | bfb899282f500eeb9dff2600729904aad0fd39e7 (patch) | |
tree | 817752a33cd9ddb8d789e1a4318a7fad080d9676 /drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx | |
parent | 29494c174dc4793ebd236aa522a2a1ed73b7180e (diff) | |
download | linux-bfb899282f500eeb9dff2600729904aad0fd39e7.tar.bz2 |
drm: only take the crtc lock for ->cursor_set
First convert ->cursor_set to only take the crtc lock, since that
seems to be the function with the least amount of state - the core
ioctl function doesn't check anything which can change at runtime, so
we don't have any object lifetime issues to contend.
The only thing which is important is that the driver's implementation
doesn't touch any state outside of that single crtc which is not yet
properly protected by other locking:
- ast: access the global ast->cache_kmap. Luckily we only have on crtc
on this driver, so this is fine. Add a comment.
- gma500: calls gma_power_begin|and and psb_gtt_pin|unpin, both which
have their own locking to protect their state. Everything else is
crtc-local.
- i915: touches a bit of global gem state, all protected by the One
Lock to Rule Them All (dev->struct_mutex).
- nouveau: Pre-nv50 is all nice, nv50+ uses the evo channels to queue
up all display changes. And some of these channels are device
global. But this is fine now since the previous patch introduced an
evo channel mutex.
- radeon: Uses some indirect register access for cursor updates, but
with the previous patches to protect these indirect 2-register
access patterns with a spinlock, this should be fine now, too.
- vmwgfx: I have no idea how that works - update_cursor_position
doesn't take any per-crtc argument and I haven't figured out any
other place where this could be set in some form of a side-channel.
But vmwgfx definitely has more than one crtc (or at least can
register more than one), so I have no idea how this is supposed to
not fail with the current code already. Hence take the easy way out
and simply acquire all locks (which requires dropping the crtc lock
the core acquired for us). That way it's not worse off for
consistency than the old code.
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <rob@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 32 |
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c index 9c0876b908ae..8d82e631c305 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c @@ -180,16 +180,29 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv, struct vmw_dma_buffer *dmabuf = NULL; int ret; + /* + * FIXME: Unclear whether there's any global state touched by the + * cursor_set function, especially vmw_cursor_update_position looks + * suspicious. For now take the easy route and reacquire all locks. We + * can do this since the caller in the drm core doesn't check anything + * which is protected by any looks. + */ + mutex_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + drm_modeset_lock_all(dev_priv->dev); + /* A lot of the code assumes this */ - if (handle && (width != 64 || height != 64)) - return -EINVAL; + if (handle && (width != 64 || height != 64)) { + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; + } if (handle) { ret = vmw_user_lookup_handle(dev_priv, tfile, handle, &surface, &dmabuf); if (ret) { DRM_ERROR("failed to find surface or dmabuf: %i\n", ret); - return -EINVAL; + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; } } @@ -197,7 +210,8 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv, if (surface && !surface->snooper.image) { DRM_ERROR("surface not suitable for cursor\n"); vmw_surface_unreference(&surface); - return -EINVAL; + ret = -EINVAL; + goto out; } /* takedown old cursor */ @@ -225,14 +239,20 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv, du->hotspot_x, du->hotspot_y); } else { vmw_cursor_update_position(dev_priv, false, 0, 0); - return 0; + ret = 0; + goto out; } vmw_cursor_update_position(dev_priv, true, du->cursor_x + du->hotspot_x, du->cursor_y + du->hotspot_y); - return 0; + ret = 0; +out: + drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev_priv->dev); + mutex_lock(&crtc->mutex); + + return ret; } int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_move(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y) |