diff options
author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2016-02-15 02:19:31 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2016-03-09 14:41:04 +0100 |
commit | 4cccf7555770b787fa80791a1407a27301f03920 (patch) | |
tree | dc13b9cde7a19c1416707bbb88307572f559b952 /drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | |
parent | 57eb832f90e645dcb97d651ad052c0537cc1b3a7 (diff) | |
download | linux-4cccf7555770b787fa80791a1407a27301f03920.tar.bz2 |
cpufreq: governor: Get rid of the ->gov_check_cpu callback
The way the ->gov_check_cpu governor callback is used by the ondemand
and conservative governors is not really straightforward. Namely, the
governor calls dbs_check_cpu() that updates the load information for
the policy and the invokes ->gov_check_cpu() for the governor.
To get rid of that entanglement, notice that cpufreq_governor_limits()
doesn't need to call dbs_check_cpu() directly. Instead, it can simply
reset the sample delay to 0 which will cause a sample to be taken
immediately. The result of that is practically equivalent to calling
dbs_check_cpu() except that it will trigger a full update of governor
internal state and not just the ->gov_check_cpu() part.
Following that observation, make cpufreq_governor_limits() reset
the sample delay and turn dbs_check_cpu() into a function that will
simply evaluate the load and return the result called dbs_update().
That function can now be called by governors from the routines that
previously were pointed to by ->gov_check_cpu and those routines
can be called directly by each governor instead of dbs_check_cpu().
This way ->gov_check_cpu becomes unnecessary, so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 26 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c index 6243502ce24d..2e9040e8640c 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c @@ -44,20 +44,20 @@ static inline unsigned int get_freq_target(struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners, * Any frequency increase takes it to the maximum frequency. Frequency reduction * happens at minimum steps of 5% (default) of maximum frequency */ -static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load) +static unsigned int cs_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) { - struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, cpu); - struct cpufreq_policy *policy = dbs_info->cdbs.policy_dbs->policy; + struct cs_cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info = &per_cpu(cs_cpu_dbs_info, policy->cpu); struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data; struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data; struct cs_dbs_tuners *cs_tuners = dbs_data->tuners; + unsigned int load = dbs_update(policy); /* * break out if we 'cannot' reduce the speed as the user might * want freq_step to be zero */ if (cs_tuners->freq_step == 0) - return; + goto out; /* Check for frequency increase */ if (load > dbs_data->up_threshold) { @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load) /* if we are already at full speed then break out early */ if (dbs_info->requested_freq == policy->max) - return; + goto out; dbs_info->requested_freq += get_freq_target(cs_tuners, policy); @@ -74,12 +74,12 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load) __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, dbs_info->requested_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H); - return; + goto out; } /* if sampling_down_factor is active break out early */ if (++dbs_info->down_skip < dbs_data->sampling_down_factor) - return; + goto out; dbs_info->down_skip = 0; /* Check for frequency decrease */ @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load) * if we cannot reduce the frequency anymore, break out early */ if (policy->cur == policy->min) - return; + goto out; freq_target = get_freq_target(cs_tuners, policy); if (dbs_info->requested_freq > freq_target) @@ -99,16 +99,9 @@ static void cs_check_cpu(int cpu, unsigned int load) __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, dbs_info->requested_freq, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L); - return; } -} - -static unsigned int cs_dbs_timer(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) -{ - struct policy_dbs_info *policy_dbs = policy->governor_data; - struct dbs_data *dbs_data = policy_dbs->dbs_data; - dbs_check_cpu(policy); + out: return delay_for_sampling_rate(dbs_data->sampling_rate); } @@ -300,7 +293,6 @@ static struct dbs_governor cs_dbs_gov = { .get_cpu_cdbs = get_cpu_cdbs, .get_cpu_dbs_info_s = get_cpu_dbs_info_s, .gov_dbs_timer = cs_dbs_timer, - .gov_check_cpu = cs_check_cpu, .init = cs_init, .exit = cs_exit, }; |