ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfiguration notifiers

Add support for ACPI reconfiguration notifiers to allow subsystems
to react to changes in the ACPI tables that happen after the initial
enumeration. This is similar with the way dynamic device tree
notifications work.

The reconfigure notifications supported for now are device add and
device remove.

Since ACPICA allows only one table notification handler, this patch
makes the table notifier function generic and moves it out of the
sysfs specific code.

Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

1 files changed, 67 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index f80f8a747294..405056b95b05 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ static void acpi_device_del(struct acpi_device *device)
 	device_del(&device->dev);
 }
 
+static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(acpi_reconfig_chain);
+
 static LIST_HEAD(acpi_device_del_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_del_lock);
 
@@ -514,6 +516,9 @@ static void acpi_device_del_work_fn(struct work_struct *work_not_used)
 
 		mutex_unlock(&acpi_device_del_lock);
 
+		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&acpi_reconfig_chain,
+					     ACPI_RECONFIG_DEVICE_REMOVE, adev);
+
 		acpi_device_del(adev);
 		/*
 		 * Drop references to all power resources that might have been
@@ -1676,7 +1681,7 @@ static void acpi_default_enumeration(struct acpi_device *device)
 	bool is_spi_i2c_slave = false;
 
 	/*
-	 * Do not enemerate SPI/I2C slaves as they will be enuerated by their
+	 * Do not enumerate SPI/I2C slaves as they will be enumerated by their
 	 * respective parents.
 	 */
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
@@ -1686,6 +1691,9 @@ static void acpi_default_enumeration(struct acpi_device *device)
 	if (!is_spi_i2c_slave) {
 		acpi_create_platform_device(device);
 		acpi_device_set_enumerated(device);
+	} else {
+		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&acpi_reconfig_chain,
+					     ACPI_RECONFIG_DEVICE_ADD, device);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1917,6 +1925,8 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
 	return result < 0 ? result : 0;
 }
 
+static bool acpi_scan_initialized;
+
 int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 {
 	int result;
@@ -1961,6 +1971,8 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 
 	acpi_update_all_gpes();
 
+	acpi_scan_initialized = true;
+
  out:
 	mutex_unlock(&acpi_scan_lock);
 	return result;
@@ -2004,3 +2016,57 @@ int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(struct acpi_probe_entry *ap_head, int nr)
 
 	return count;
 }
+
+struct acpi_table_events_work {
+	struct work_struct work;
+	void *table;
+	u32 event;
+};
+
+static void acpi_table_events_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct acpi_table_events_work *tew;
+
+	tew = container_of(work, struct acpi_table_events_work, work);
+
+	if (tew->event == ACPI_TABLE_EVENT_LOAD) {
+		acpi_scan_lock_acquire();
+		acpi_bus_scan(ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT);
+		acpi_scan_lock_release();
+	}
+
+	kfree(tew);
+}
+
+void acpi_scan_table_handler(u32 event, void *table, void *context)
+{
+	struct acpi_table_events_work *tew;
+
+	if (!acpi_scan_initialized)
+		return;
+
+	if (event != ACPI_TABLE_EVENT_LOAD)
+		return;
+
+	tew = kmalloc(sizeof(*tew), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!tew)
+		return;
+
+	INIT_WORK(&tew->work, acpi_table_events_fn);
+	tew->table = table;
+	tew->event = event;
+
+	schedule_work(&tew->work);
+}
+
+int acpi_reconfig_notifier_register(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&acpi_reconfig_chain, nb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_reconfig_notifier_register);
+
+int acpi_reconfig_notifier_unregister(struct notifier_block *nb)
+{
+	return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&acpi_reconfig_chain, nb);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_reconfig_notifier_unregister);