diff options
author | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2022-02-04 18:40:20 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2022-02-14 20:14:40 +0100 |
commit | 9aa60f3cbafb0facc15a6114df7616a1bf23a88d (patch) | |
tree | 7e343e0314664452e4e52e037ee838ef4459f37a /drivers/acpi/ec.c | |
parent | 977dc3082285206e7b1fcbc4496671194cfb7980 (diff) | |
download | linux-9aa60f3cbafb0facc15a6114df7616a1bf23a88d.tar.bz2 |
ACPI: EC: Do not return result from advance_transaction()
Notice that the if the event state is EC_EVENT_READY, the event
handling work cannot be pending, so it is not necessary to check
the return value of queue_work() in acpi_ec_submit_event().
Moreover, whether or not there is any EC work pending at the
moment can always be checked by looking at the events_in_progress
and queries_in_progress counters, so acpi_ec_submit_event() and
consequently advance_transaction() need not return results.
Accordingly, make acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() always use the counters
mentioned above (for first_ec) to check if there is any pending EC
work to flush and turn both acpi_ec_submit_event() and
advance_transaction() into void functions (again, because they were
void functions in the past).
While at it, add a clarifying comment about the acpi_ec_mask_events()
call in advance_transaction().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/ec.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/ec.c | 38 |
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c index f039565d59ad..e202c0c370b1 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ struct acpi_ec_query { }; static int acpi_ec_submit_query(struct acpi_ec *ec); -static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt); +static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt); static void acpi_ec_event_handler(struct work_struct *work); struct acpi_ec *first_ec; @@ -441,11 +441,15 @@ static bool acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(struct acpi_ec *ec) return true; } -static bool acpi_ec_submit_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) +static void acpi_ec_submit_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) { + /* + * It is safe to mask the events here, because acpi_ec_close_event() + * will run at least once after this. + */ acpi_ec_mask_events(ec); if (!acpi_ec_event_enabled(ec)) - return false; + return; if (ec->event_state == EC_EVENT_READY) { ec_dbg_evt("Command(%s) submitted/blocked", @@ -460,17 +464,11 @@ static bool acpi_ec_submit_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) * queue up the event work to start the same loop again. */ if (ec->events_to_process++ > 0) - return true; + return; ec->events_in_progress++; - return queue_work(ec_wq, &ec->work); + queue_work(ec_wq, &ec->work); } - - /* - * The event handling work has not been completed yet, so it needs to be - * flushed. - */ - return true; } static void acpi_ec_complete_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) @@ -655,11 +653,10 @@ static void acpi_ec_spurious_interrupt(struct acpi_ec *ec, struct transaction *t acpi_ec_mask_events(ec); } -static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt) +static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt) { struct transaction *t = ec->curr; bool wakeup = false; - bool ret = false; u8 status; ec_dbg_stm("%s (%d)", interrupt ? "IRQ" : "TASK", smp_processor_id()); @@ -724,12 +721,10 @@ static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt) out: if (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) - ret = acpi_ec_submit_event(ec); + acpi_ec_submit_event(ec); if (wakeup && interrupt) wake_up(&ec->wait); - - return ret; } static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec) @@ -2051,6 +2046,11 @@ void acpi_ec_set_gpe_wake_mask(u8 action) acpi_set_gpe_wake_mask(NULL, first_ec->gpe, action); } +static bool acpi_ec_work_in_progress(struct acpi_ec *ec) +{ + return ec->events_in_progress + ec->queries_in_progress > 0; +} + bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void) { bool work_in_progress = false; @@ -2084,7 +2084,8 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void) if (acpi_ec_gpe_status_set(first_ec)) { pm_pr_dbg("ACPI EC GPE status set\n"); - work_in_progress = advance_transaction(first_ec, false); + advance_transaction(first_ec, false); + work_in_progress = acpi_ec_work_in_progress(first_ec); } spin_unlock_irq(&first_ec->lock); @@ -2102,8 +2103,7 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void) spin_lock_irq(&first_ec->lock); - work_in_progress = first_ec->events_in_progress + - first_ec->queries_in_progress > 0; + work_in_progress = acpi_ec_work_in_progress(first_ec); spin_unlock_irq(&first_ec->lock); } while (work_in_progress && !pm_wakeup_pending()); |