acpi: Use pr_warn instead of pr_warning

As said in commit f2c2cbcc35d4 ("powerpc: Use pr_warn instead of
pr_warning"), removing pr_warning so all logging messages use a
consistent <prefix>_warn style. Let's do it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191018031850.48498-8-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
[pmladek@suse.com: two more indentation fixes]
Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

1 files changed, 22 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
index 131c35ee9ed3..e358d0046494 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
@@ -170,9 +170,9 @@ rewind:
 		if (ip == ctx->ip) {
 			if (entry->instruction >= ctx->instructions ||
 			    !ctx->ins_table[entry->instruction].run) {
-				pr_warning(FW_WARN APEI_PFX
-			"Invalid action table, unknown instruction type: %d\n",
-					   entry->instruction);
+				pr_warn(FW_WARN APEI_PFX
+					"Invalid action table, unknown instruction type: %d\n",
+					entry->instruction);
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
 			run = ctx->ins_table[entry->instruction].run;
@@ -211,9 +211,9 @@ static int apei_exec_for_each_entry(struct apei_exec_context *ctx,
 		if (end)
 			*end = i;
 		if (ins >= ctx->instructions || !ins_table[ins].run) {
-			pr_warning(FW_WARN APEI_PFX
-			"Invalid action table, unknown instruction type: %d\n",
-				   ins);
+			pr_warn(FW_WARN APEI_PFX
+				"Invalid action table, unknown instruction type: %d\n",
+				ins);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		rc = func(ctx, entry, data);
@@ -579,18 +579,18 @@ static int apei_check_gar(struct acpi_generic_address *reg, u64 *paddr,
 	space_id = reg->space_id;
 	*paddr = get_unaligned(&reg->address);
 	if (!*paddr) {
-		pr_warning(FW_BUG APEI_PFX
-			   "Invalid physical address in GAR [0x%llx/%u/%u/%u/%u]\n",
-			   *paddr, bit_width, bit_offset, access_size_code,
-			   space_id);
+		pr_warn(FW_BUG APEI_PFX
+			"Invalid physical address in GAR [0x%llx/%u/%u/%u/%u]\n",
+			*paddr, bit_width, bit_offset, access_size_code,
+			space_id);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (access_size_code < 1 || access_size_code > 4) {
-		pr_warning(FW_BUG APEI_PFX
-			   "Invalid access size code in GAR [0x%llx/%u/%u/%u/%u]\n",
-			   *paddr, bit_width, bit_offset, access_size_code,
-			   space_id);
+		pr_warn(FW_BUG APEI_PFX
+			"Invalid access size code in GAR [0x%llx/%u/%u/%u/%u]\n",
+			*paddr, bit_width, bit_offset, access_size_code,
+			space_id);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	*access_bit_width = 1UL << (access_size_code + 2);
@@ -604,19 +604,19 @@ static int apei_check_gar(struct acpi_generic_address *reg, u64 *paddr,
 		*access_bit_width = 64;
 
 	if ((bit_width + bit_offset) > *access_bit_width) {
-		pr_warning(FW_BUG APEI_PFX
-			   "Invalid bit width + offset in GAR [0x%llx/%u/%u/%u/%u]\n",
-			   *paddr, bit_width, bit_offset, access_size_code,
-			   space_id);
+		pr_warn(FW_BUG APEI_PFX
+			"Invalid bit width + offset in GAR [0x%llx/%u/%u/%u/%u]\n",
+			*paddr, bit_width, bit_offset, access_size_code,
+			space_id);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	if (space_id != ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY &&
 	    space_id != ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO) {
-		pr_warning(FW_BUG APEI_PFX
-			   "Invalid address space type in GAR [0x%llx/%u/%u/%u/%u]\n",
-			   *paddr, bit_width, bit_offset, access_size_code,
-			   space_id);
+		pr_warn(FW_BUG APEI_PFX
+			"Invalid address space type in GAR [0x%llx/%u/%u/%u/%u]\n",
+			*paddr, bit_width, bit_offset, access_size_code,
+			space_id);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}