summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>2015-02-05 15:20:01 +0800
committerRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>2015-02-05 15:31:37 +0100
commitb18da580343b88fa33bbba8a7f48392447bc6cbf (patch)
treee2978df7f802a21e5df6c871aeccefbda9ce2f35 /drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
parent833bb9316a3b4644b2671317ec4889e343ae5d42 (diff)
downloadlinux-b18da580343b88fa33bbba8a7f48392447bc6cbf.tar.bz2
ACPICA: Events: Remove acpi_ev_valid_gpe_event() due to current restriction
ACPICA commit 8823b44ff53859ab24ecfcfd3fba8cc56b17d223 Currently we rely on the logic that GPE blocks will never be deleted, otherwise we can be broken by the race between acpi_ev_create_gpe_block(), acpi_ev_delete_gpe_block() and acpi_ev_gpe_detect(). On the other hand, if we want to protect GPE block creation/deletion, we need to use a different synchronization facility to protect the period between acpi_ev_gpe_dispatch() and acpi_ev_asynch_enable_gpe(). Which leaves us no choice but abandoning the ACPI_MTX_EVENTS used during this period. This patch removes ACPI_MTX_EVENTS used during this period and the acpi_ev_valid_gpe_event() to reflect current restriction. Lv Zheng. Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/8823b44f Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c62
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 49 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
index b2e63e785719..ddee96733403 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
@@ -474,51 +474,14 @@ static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method(void *context)
{
struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info = context;
acpi_status status;
- struct acpi_gpe_event_info *local_gpe_event_info;
struct acpi_evaluate_info *info;
struct acpi_gpe_notify_info *notify;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method);
- /* Allocate a local GPE block */
-
- local_gpe_event_info =
- ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(struct acpi_gpe_event_info));
- if (!local_gpe_event_info) {
- ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, AE_NO_MEMORY, "while handling a GPE"));
- return_VOID;
- }
-
- status = acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(ACPI_MTX_EVENTS);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_FREE(local_gpe_event_info);
- return_VOID;
- }
-
- /* Must revalidate the gpe_number/gpe_block */
-
- if (!acpi_ev_valid_gpe_event(gpe_event_info)) {
- status = acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_EVENTS);
- ACPI_FREE(local_gpe_event_info);
- return_VOID;
- }
-
- /*
- * Take a snapshot of the GPE info for this level - we copy the info to
- * prevent a race condition with remove_handler/remove_block.
- */
- ACPI_MEMCPY(local_gpe_event_info, gpe_event_info,
- sizeof(struct acpi_gpe_event_info));
-
- status = acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_EVENTS);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_FREE(local_gpe_event_info);
- return_VOID;
- }
-
/* Do the correct dispatch - normal method or implicit notify */
- switch (local_gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK) {
+ switch (gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK) {
case ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY:
/*
* Implicit notify.
@@ -531,7 +494,7 @@ static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method(void *context)
* June 2012: Expand implicit notify mechanism to support
* notifies on multiple device objects.
*/
- notify = local_gpe_event_info->dispatch.notify_list;
+ notify = gpe_event_info->dispatch.notify_list;
while (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && notify) {
status =
acpi_ev_queue_notify_request(notify->device_node,
@@ -555,7 +518,7 @@ static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method(void *context)
* _Lxx/_Exx control method that corresponds to this GPE
*/
info->prefix_node =
- local_gpe_event_info->dispatch.method_node;
+ gpe_event_info->dispatch.method_node;
info->flags = ACPI_IGNORE_RETURN_VALUE;
status = acpi_ns_evaluate(info);
@@ -565,25 +528,27 @@ static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method(void *context)
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
"while evaluating GPE method [%4.4s]",
- acpi_ut_get_node_name
- (local_gpe_event_info->dispatch.
- method_node)));
+ acpi_ut_get_node_name(gpe_event_info->
+ dispatch.
+ method_node)));
}
break;
default:
- return_VOID; /* Should never happen */
+ goto error_exit; /* Should never happen */
}
/* Defer enabling of GPE until all notify handlers are done */
status = acpi_os_execute(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER,
- acpi_ev_asynch_enable_gpe,
- local_gpe_event_info);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- ACPI_FREE(local_gpe_event_info);
+ acpi_ev_asynch_enable_gpe, gpe_event_info);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ return_VOID;
}
+
+error_exit:
+ acpi_ev_asynch_enable_gpe(gpe_event_info);
return_VOID;
}
@@ -611,7 +576,6 @@ static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE acpi_ev_asynch_enable_gpe(void *context)
(void)acpi_ev_finish_gpe(gpe_event_info);
acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock, flags);
- ACPI_FREE(gpe_event_info);
return;
}